• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D (2024) What older setting do you want to see next?

Which older D&D setting would you like to see next?

  • Greyhawk

    Votes: 33 26.2%
  • Mystara

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • Birthright

    Votes: 12 9.5%
  • Council of Wyrms

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • Ghostwalk

    Votes: 4 3.2%
  • Nentir Vale/Nerath/Points of Light

    Votes: 25 19.8%
  • Other (please specify in post)

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • Dark Sun

    Votes: 27 21.4%

  • Poll closed .

log in or register to remove this ad


Could make it the default setting again.
Why, though?

FR's the one that your average person is going to know, its the one with the massive amount of popular games to it (With only PS: Torment being an exception), its the one with the known books, its the one that can freely admit any of the various new races and stuff, its the one that an average person would think "Ah yes, Dungeons and Dragons" about.

Greyhawk's only appeal is to the nostalgia crowd. It doesn't have any draw over what FR can do, plus every time someone suggests adding in new player option I'm told this'll destroy everything that makes Greyhawk Greyhawk and we should just be fine with the default four (And maybe gnomes if they're feeling generous)

"You can't play as the fun player options that people specifically want to play and enjoy playing" is not what I'd call a good draw
 

Greyhawk would be purely a nostalgia play for the 50th anniversary. If it doesn't show up in 2024, it's not showing up.
Well, Winninger has said that a Setting previously covered in 5E is up for a "revisit" in 2024, and the three likely ca dilated are Forgotten Realms (obviously), Eberron (plausible, a surprising percentage of the mechanics not being updated between Monsters of the Multiverse and the new Core are Eberron specific, also a 20th anniversary), and Greyhawk (Ghoats of Saltmarsh, 50th anniversary nostalgia play).

I do agree.it is unlikely if not done in 2024, but it is a strong contender.
 

Why, though?

FR's the one that your average person is going to know, its the one with the massive amount of popular games to it (With only PS: Torment being an exception), its the one with the known books, its the one that can freely admit any of the various new races and stuff, its the one that an average person would think "Ah yes, Dungeons and Dragons" about.

Greyhawk's only appeal is to the nostalgia crowd. It doesn't have any draw over what FR can do, plus every time someone suggests adding in new player option I'm told this'll destroy everything that makes Greyhawk Greyhawk and we should just be fine with the default four (And maybe gnomes if they're feeling generous)

"You can't play as the fun player options that people specifically want to play and enjoy playing" is not what I'd call a good draw
The spoiler.play here for OneD&D purposes are Feats. With Feats moving into Core and being ventral to Background, options that are a bit more specific than those in the PHB are wide open design space. And Greyhawk has all sorts of 3E nostalgia callbacks that can be done there.
 


Even the name "savage" is highly problematic.

My familiarity with it specifically means a savage animal, hence ferocious and aggressive.

Unfortunately, there was a (highly racist) anthropological use of the term to mean a nonliterate aboriginal culture.

The word itself can dehumanize, especially if referring vaguely to a "savage coast", where the savages probably refer to humans or humanoids.
It's also known as the Orc's Head Peninsula. Could go with that.
 



I would be good with Darksun, Greyhawk or the Forgotten Realms, as long as we get a real setting and not the snippets of one we got with Spelljammer.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top