Pathfinder 1E What project would you like Paizo to tacke next for Pathfinder?

[Cor_Malek]

Nothing wrong with detailed maps. If I'd like some - I could buy some. If I'd rather model some area myself, I'll go ahead and ignore the additional content.

I guess it depends on how people treat additional (and core, for that matter) content. In any game I played or led, unless whole group specifically agreed to use some addon, anything beside core books did not happen. As to any settings - tbh, I always preferred own mini worlds. But if I'd play something in FR, then it'd be quite quantum world. Until observed by PC's, anything and everything would simultaneously be and not be as described in canon.
"So there was supposed to be a lake where this village is? Damn, son - should've paid more to the cartographer. Your master was a Psychic? A shame, really - my auntie Muriel had some problems herself, but she got better when her son got married."

TBH I rarely create maps from scrap, I prefer using old maps of Europe. If I was to use Paizo-made settings - yeah, this stuff could be useful The only reason for not buying it would be the simple fact, that set prices are unfavourable for my location ;-) But since I consider them to be good value (just not piss-cheap as to buy something to maybe use it, sometime), I'd suspect that customers of my profile (not really interested in maps, but curious) from UK or US or France could buy one even if out of curiosity.
But then again, it's hardly something for writers to work on, The Kids These Days* don't appreciate a good ASCII map.

* I hereby claim ownership over TKTD acronym. It's gonna be big in about 10 years, I reckon.

 

[Argyle King]

I'd like to see a Ptolus update.

Aside from that, having a few rules for monsters as characters would be nice. Not everybody wants to be the hero all the time.

 

[Haffrung Helleyes]

Ptolus

You know, I really do agree that Paizo ought to make arrangements with Monte to set Ptolus in Golarion. We're probably never going to see another city supplement to equal it.

Ken

 

[DaveMage]

You know, I really do agree that Paizo ought to make arrangements with Monte to set Ptolus in Golarion. We're probably never going to see another city supplement to equal it.

Ken

The Ptolus universe/cosmology doesn't match that of Golarion, though.

I think (because of the cosmology) Ptolus works best in its own space rather than linked to a different setting.

 

[Haffrung Helleyes]

Well

Obviously some things would have to change.

It's just that I don't see Golarion getting a city setting with the level of detail Ptolus possesses any other way.

Ken

 

[DaveMage]

Obviously some things would have to change.

It's just that I don't see Golarion getting a city setting with the level of detail Ptolus possesses any other way.

Ken

Actually, this reminds me of one of my hopes with Paizo: special (deluxe) products.

I hope they don't get gun-shy on stuff like this.

I'd love Paizo to take a shot at a megadungeon.
I'd love Paizo to take a shot at a megacity.
I'd love Paizo to take a shot at a deluxe adventure box set (ala Return to the Tomb of Horrors or Night Below) with player handouts, perhaps paper minis, etc.

 

[William Ronald]

Perhaps one of the best choices for a mega-city on Golarion would be Absalom, although there is an excellent supplement on it now.

 

[IronWolf]

Perhaps one of the best choices for a mega-city on Golarion would be Absalom, although there is an excellent supplement on it now.

Absalom was the first to come to my mind as well. Seems like a place ripe for exploration. For some reason the Puddles district just calls to me!

 

[Sylrae]

In a game I'm playing in right now, the GM has retrofit Ptolus to go into Golarion. He put it right next to Absalom. It's working pretty well right now.

 

[Nookie]

Psionics and than epic so they don't have to make an epic psionic book later.