What RPG(s) did you stick with an earlier edition?

[Micah Sweet]

7th sea 1ed - i read 2ed and just nope. Changes are so radical, they are esentially 2 different games that just share name and setting

Same. The setting isn't the same between editions either, not really. They made a lot of lore changes. That whole Kickstarter very much felt like a bait and switch to me. I ended up only really appreciating the 1e pdf collection.

 

[kronovan]

Star Trek Adventures. My players really like the Challenge Dice and 2nd edition doesn't use them. Not to mention in my country a set of STA dice cost a fair amount of $s, so I wasn't so keen on tossing them out.

 

[DammitVictor]

But Pathfinder 1e is one of those games. Never cottoned to the three action economy and it just seemed like a lot to relearn and... for the most part I always like 3PP Pathfinder content better. (No shade; my favorite 3PP is by former Paizo staff.) [...] Barely,  barely even counts... but I prefer Rokugan as a 3.X D&D campaign setting to L5R proper. Mostly because it's easier to fold, spindle, and mutilate into homebrew settings. Still wish that I could afford to get 4e in print.

Feel like I should note, that between these two passages... I'm also describing how I run D&D/PF. WotC, Paizo, and Rokugan d20 are "official content" for my games, mostly defaulting to PF1 for overlapping content; there isn't a whole hell of a lot of 3PP 3.X material I care for, but there's a ton of 3PP PF1 material I use to a greater or lesser degree.

I really want to run a Gestalt game, sort of Spelljammer Rokugan, with No Core Classes.

I also really want to put together a Unified Field Theory that unites ki/Void/WFM, psionics/occult, and incarnum/akasha to more or less "bake in" these things into the "core rules" rather than treating them as niche accessories and replacing the Four in the Core.

 

[Scott Christian]

Vampire: The Masquerade​

 

[M.L. Martin]

D&D.