Burt Baccara
Explorer
The 5e core books? Where?The books literally have the age range on them... Wait what age range do you think D&D is marketed for?
The 5e core books? Where?The books literally have the age range on them... Wait what age range do you think D&D is marketed for?
As you should, but then I don't expect historical accuracy in a form of entertainment like I might expect in a peer reviewed article from an academic journal. In most games, I'm just looking for verisimilitude.Of course it is called role playing but I remain somewhat sceptical of "historically accurate" roleplaying.
That's all part of the adolescent fantasy which is part of the appeal I think. I've often found players who are used to D&D have some cultural shock when they play another game where they're obligated to follow rules or respect authority figures unless they want to suffer some serious consequences. I still remember a Vampire player bitterly complaining that the Prince was being unfair. Yeah, that's kind of how Vampire society works. It sucks!Which is why some much of D&D occurs over the civilised border. It is why most fantasy states in any D&D setting cannot control their own borders or even secure the interior. They use roving bands of armed assassins to do the job that should be done by the local constabulary/militia. These so called bands of adventures are not answerable to any authority. It would not be tolerated by any nation or kingdom that could enforce its laws.
Apparently Wizards of the Coast are going door to door and telling everyone what they can do in their living rooms.However, the OP of this thread seems to be about removing all such material from private games and I was wondering where this was coming from. Hence my question.
In my experience they are not studying history but not really aping history. The real source material is more likely to be a novel (series), movie or TV show. More "I, Claudius" or "Name of the Rose"
It's on the starter setsThe 5e core books? Where?
It's on the starter sets
It isn’t considered studying history. You missed the context of the comments about learning history. Someone posted that learning history will sometimes make you comfortable. That doesn’t mean that playing games must also do so.How is suddenly any knowledge of Rome and its economy that goes beyond guys in toga that talk latin being considered studying history?
There is a very large space between studying history and aping history and I hope mist people fall into that space.
And even if not, if RPGs also teach people some historic facts they didn't know I would consider it a bonus.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.