What would people like to see more of in Polyhedron?

(Multiple choice) What would people like to see more of in Polyhedron?

  • Adventures for already published d20 games.

    Votes: 23 51.1%
  • New rules for already published d20 games.

    Votes: 16 35.6%
  • New d20 settings.

    Votes: 26 57.8%
  • Previews of new d20 games.

    Votes: 12 26.7%
  • New d20 mini-games.

    Votes: 24 53.3%

Simplicity

Explorer
(The previous poll was messed up... So, I repost with
multiple choices...)

The Dungeon/Polyhedron poll has come up with nearly
half (approx. 45%) of the people here saying that they
like the combination of Dungeon and Polyhedron, and
approx 11% saying they wish Polyhedron would be
removed from Dungeon.

Since it looks like Polyhedron is here to stay, I want to
find out what it is that people look for in a magazine
like this. As I said in a previous post, I would much prefer
Polyhedron if it were to publish adventures/additional rules
for already published and well-liked d20 systems (like Call
of Cthulu).

Other people seem to really like the d20 mini-games.

Polyhedral also serves as a preview for upcoming d20
products. This is something I really dislike, since it almost
seems to make the magazine seem like one big
advertisement... and I think ENWorld does a good enough job for previewing d20 games... but I'm sure other people like it.

What do people think?
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad



Theuderic said:
Oh no, here it comes!

Disappointed more people aren't responding to your troll?


To answer the question I think I would like cool new fantasy settings ala Spelljammer. Currently I do not purchase Dungeon/Polyhedron at all (I like making my own adventures) but if they did that i would probably by more of it.

Then again I am probably close to alone on that particular issue.
 
Last edited:


I like the minigames, and I want to see more of them.

I'd also like to see more material published for them, like the Orangutan.

One-page supplements to minigames would be cool.
 

<body bgcolor="#000000"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tr>
<td width="2%" style="border: 2 solid #FFFF99"><p align="center"><b><font color="#FFFF99" size="2">X</font></b></td><td width="98%"><font color="#FFFF99" size="2">   I don't read Polyhedron Magazine.</font></td>
</tr></table></body>
 
Last edited:

Theuderic said:
No actually I was expecting to get shot down I'm suprised I haven't. :D

:confused:

Shot down for what? Expressing an opinion?



I would love to see adventures for exsisting d20 games, new d20 settings AND new d20 mini games. I have been very impressed with the mini games so far (and really didn't think I would be) and having adventures for these or (even better) d20 CoC, d20 Modern etc would make Polyhedron as useful to me as Dungeon is.
 


About liking old edtions of D&D?

It always seems so strange to me that people get so worked up over which edition is played most/best/least etc.

I have played and loved pretty much every edition of D&D (except the original Chainmail rules, just a couple of years before my time). They have all had good points and bad points. None are perfect and none have been terrible.

Sorry for the thread hijack - we now return you to your regularly scheduled posts :D
 

Remove ads

Top