tarchon said:
I guess that means if you game in a language that doesn't mark pronouns for gender, you can play whatever you want?
It could mean that it's not as much of an issue. Some comments by Finnish role-players that I've read suggest that might be the case. It could also be different in Japanese, where the first person pronouns as well as overall language use have a strongly gender-specific component. I don't role-play in either Japanese or Finnish so I really can't be sure. But I do know that in English, which is the language I use, pronoun usage is an issue that has been commented on by other people in this thread.
tarchon said:
And you can't play warforged in English because they don't have gender?
English has a neuter gender. Perhaps you've heard of "it"? What do they use in the source material? Does anyone have experience playing in games with Warforged characters? Did the players refer to them as "he", "she", or "it"?
tarchon said:
Lasher Dragon had a good point. The only thing that was perhaps excessive was the "LMAO" in the end, but pointing out the logical absurdity implied by an absurd contention is not an insult, it's just logic. Reductio ad absurdum is in no way a fallacy.
When the reductio ad absurdum is applied to a straw man, when it begs the question, or when it's used as a crude appeal to consequences, it can be. When the "ad absurdum" is either (A) built on top of a straw man or (B) ignores distinctions that differentiate the absurd conclusion from the initial argument, it's essentially a hollow argument.
Nobody (to my knowledge) was claiming that nobody should be able to role-play any character that has characteristics different than the player. That's either (A) the straw man or (B) begging the question. It's a straw man if it's a characterization designed to be knocked down. It's begging the question if the assumption is that a player or character's sex is as significant as any other attribute that the player might have in common or different from their character.
By the way, I wasn't claiming that the reductio was insulting. That's another straw man. Calling people immature or insane if they don't agree with you, however, is insulting.
tarchon said:
The fact is that it's very clear that some people just have a specific problem with cross-gender RP, and it seems just as clear that it's almost always rooted in discomfort with gender role confusion.
Do you have evidence to support your assumption? In my case, it has nothing to do with discomfort with gender role confusion. In the case of other people I know, it has nothing to do with gender role confusion. In the case of several other responses in this thread, it seems to have nothing to do with gender role confusion.
tarchon said:
Good, bad, I don't know, but there's little doubt in my mind that that's what it's all about.
That's nice. And with my equally subjective anecdotal evidence, I see plenty of evidence that that's not what it's all about. In some cases? Yes. In many cases? No.
tarchon said:
In my groups we played cross gender characters all the time, and the pronoun thing hardly ever came up. You use the gender according to whether you're talking about the player or the PC. If Bob plays Yondara the Elf Maiden:
And I've played in groups that allow cross-gender characters and they do have the pronoun problem. I'm not claiming it is a universal problem. I'm claiming that some people do have the problem, even when it's not intentional. I've seen it, as have others in this discussion. Again, my equally subjective anecdotal evidence doesn't agree with you.
tarchon said:
Unless you have trouble remembering the difference between the PC and the player (and I hope you don't

), where's the problem?
I don't think it's an entirely conscious problem with a lot of people. In other cases, it's just laziness or inattentiveness. Maybe some players can't tell the difference between the player and the character. Different people play at different depths. Regardless of the cause, it's darned distracting when it happens. Just because you don't have a problem doesn't mean that other people don't.