Festivus said:Character builder... it's a low hanging fruit.
Ashrem Bayle said:An apology and an excuse.
Given WOTC's history with this sort of thing, I'm waiting any day now for an announcement that they aren't going to do any more with it and/or they've sold it off to a third party.
But for what it's worth, I hope I'm wrong.
Scribble said:You think? Seems like that one will require more testing to make sure they got it right...
Mistakes in that one lead to angry gamers, and people not using it... Mistakes in the visualizer seem less damaging.
Just my opinion though obviously!
Ruin Explorer said:If the visualizer is remotely as crap as it's looked EVERY SINGLE TIME they've "shown it off" so far, then people will be spitting on it from on high and it'll be a bit of a PR debacle.
Yep, that's my bet.Ashrem Bayle said:An apology and an excuse.
Given WOTC's history with this sort of thing, I'm waiting any day now for an announcement that they aren't going to do any more with it and/or they've sold it off to a third party.
But for what it's worth, I hope I'm wrong.
Me too.Tewligan said:Yep, that's my bet.
Ruin Explorer said:I don't think so.
First impressions count...
Just my opinion of course, but the visualizer needs to get it right first time, where the character builder can be close to right at first, and they can say, correctly, that we're "helping them work the last kinks out".
I'd actually be delighted if they said they'd sold this all off to a third party, because I'm CERTAIN they'd do a better job with it than WotC has. I mean, they're motivated to make a profit off it, rather than seeming very confused and conflicted about it, and clearly unsure what it's for, as WotC is. It's in a third-party's interest to provide absolutely everything possible, but not necessarily so for WotC.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.