• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Which Edition Do You Use?

Which Edition do You Use?

  • 3.0: It was good enough for me 2 years ago, it's good enough for me now.

    Votes: 85 22.0%
  • 3.5: WoTC deserves my $90. Again.

    Votes: 207 53.6%
  • I have combined the two versions into an unstoppable hybrid!

    Votes: 66 17.1%
  • 3rd Editions? I play OD&D/1e/2e/AD&D/AU/etc.

    Votes: 28 7.3%

Yo Homies you all need to stop playa hating on my man Diaglo.


playerhate.jpg
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

3.5 out of the srd. WotC hasn't gotten a dime from me since Magic of Faerun. Just the way it worked out.

I recently got Minions Complete which has 3.5 versions of the Minions monsters. I got slayer's guide to demons which says it uses 3.5 material, but that is limited to DR and listing survival in their demons, the stat blocks and stats are all 3.0, when they are close to correct. Oathbound arena and Into the Black are 3.5, although I have yet to read over ItB to verify it.
 


Joshua Dyal said:
That is true, but not because new material is 3.5 rather than 3.0. I haven't found any compatability issues for the most part for a 3.5 sourcebook in a 3.0 game.

But they have survival, not wilderness lore listed! Monsters have more feats, square facing, and the constructs have more hit points. How can you possibly deal with these daunting incompatibilities? :rolleyes:
 

A horrible abomination I like to call "3.39e". (Yes, it's the unstoppable hybrid.)

Got the classes, skills, feats, and magic from 3.5. Everything else (notably combat, equipment, weapons, etc) from 3.0. Monsters are a mix (use whatever is the more powerful version, and use both methods of DR).
 

One group I am with has gone with 3.5, and the other has stayed with 3.0. Tis interesting, to say the least, especially when the two versions' rules are mixed up. :o
 

A Very important part of makng a poll that actually reflects how people feel is to avoid putting bias into the question and answer.

In this case, the 3.5 answer shows a significant bias.

---

We are playing 3.5
 



well of course it is completely wrong too.

i mean the revised J. Holmes edition of D&D has been around for a long time. not just the last 2 years.

i owned 2edD&D version of the J.Holmes stuff but never played it.

it was never Basic to me :mad:
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top