Which image is better?

[MarkB]

Aesthetics aside, the single book gives the impression that this RPG is about a single setting, albeit one that features robot cowboy dinosaurs.

The five book spread drives home that this is a setting-agnostic system which can support a variety of settings.

 

[Emerikol]

I think the simpler one book approach is better but yes the picture you used needs some work to have the book seem more like it is in the t-rex's mouth. I assumed you were asking for overall look.

 

[Morrus]

I think the simpler one book approach is better but yes the picture you used needs some work to have the book seem more like it is in the t-rex's mouth. I assumed you were asking for overall look.

Hah! It's not supposed to look like it's in his mouth!

 

[Marc_C]

Image 1 with other books piled under but showing a bit would be better.

The problem with the 5 covers is that your eye goes all over the place. If you want to do that it would be better to put the rule book on the right, as a focal point you look at first. You can have the other four books in half size on an angle in a row starting from the left side of the image.

 

[Umbran]

I’d say 5 but I’m not crazy about the layout in the image shown.

Agreed. It looks like Montana Drones is the most important book of the bunch.

 

[Emerikol]

Hah! It's not supposed to look like it's in his mouth!

Well! Then mission not accomplished. .

I wouldn't use such an odd angle on the book if that was not your intent. I agree with Umbran (a rare occasion indeed) that Montana Drones dominates the 5 book picture too much.

 

[Fenris-77]

Five books seems luxurious, I'd go with that. I agree that the layout above perhaps isn't ideal.

 

[Morrus]

Or how about this?

 

[Morrus]

Or without the b/g.

 

[MarkB]

Or how about this?

View attachment 136701

That works better. It also sets out their hierarchy as sourcebook and supplements.