Whirtlestaff's Wizards' Academy Revisited, OOC01

[Scott DeWar]

Okay, that's two votes for the change, none against, and one neutral (me).

And NO, I'm not ruling in the way that you describe. Characters are not Peanut Butter: they can't be spread too thin in that way.

As a player i am all for the advantage of characters and getting a better bab, however, i as a dm see that as a possible messy bookeeping requirement. to maintain dm sanity i would vote against the extra bookeeping aspect and would vote against.

 

[Leif]

As a player i am all for the advantage of characters and getting a better bab, however, i as a dm see that as a possible messy bookeeping requirement. to maintain dm sanity i would vote against the extra bookeeping aspect and would vote against.

Garsh. I'm not sure if I should be flattered because my players want my life to be easier, or if I should be upset that my players think that my poor brain can't cope with one more little piece of information. Really, the bookkeeping consideration is not really a concern. But, unless you change your vote, that makes it
2 for
1 against
1 neutral (me)

3 votes yet to come

 

[renau1g]

I'm ok with it, I don't really understand the fractional BAB, but the druid is a more martial character than the wizard and Scotley's giving up some stuff on the Wizard side by not being level 4, so there should be a cookie for him . My 2 coppers.

 

[Leif]

Hark! What's that sucking sound? hehehe
j/k

 

[renau1g]

I am in one of Scotley's games.... I need to stay on his good side

 

[Scotley]

I think it is safe to say that Fin is gonna find more treasure than Harrison.

 

[KerlanRayne]

As a player i am all for the advantage of characters and getting a better bab, however, i as a dm see that as a possible messy bookeeping requirement. to maintain dm sanity i would vote against the extra bookeeping aspect and would vote against.

Huh? How often is our DM going to be calculating our BAB? Never? That book keeping is taken care of by the user as far as I know. All he needs to know is the total. If anyone is worried about cheating, we can show the breakdown on our sheets. I'm for it.

KerlanRayne

 

[Scott DeWar]

good point...maybe a capitulation is in order right now.

I think it is safe to say that Fin is gonna find more treasure than Harrison.

oh yeah, definitely a capitulation is needed!! ...place me in the "for" catagory!

 

[Leif]

The DM declares that Scotley's Motion Passes! We will calculate BAB as Scotley suggests for multi-class characters.

Just do me a favor, Scotely: DON'T RUN FOR DM OF THIS THREAD, OK?

 

[Scotley]

Hey, my poll numbers are lookin' pretty good these days. I could be the Barak Obama of this thread...

Here's another question for you mr. dm. How do you feel about players buying partially charged wands at pro-rated prices?

I ask because, while I am willing to serve as party healer, I'm not keen on blowing nearly a sixth of Tylara's starting gold on a wand of cure light wounds. I'd be willing to pay 375 for a wand with 25 charges and spend the another 375 on an arcane spell of some sort that was also half full.