• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Whirtlestaff's Wizards' Academy Revisited, OOC01

Personally, I don't think that you should have to bear the cost of party healer, once we start adventuring we could set aside a share to cover these costs.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

It would be great it we could raise the funds to buy a full wand at some point in the near future, but I do expect to benefit from the initial wand myself and I don't mind making the upfront investment in our healing, I'd just prefer not to pay the whole 750 if I could get a deal on a slightly used wand...
 

Scotley said:
Hey, my poll numbers are lookin' pretty good these days. I could be the Barak Obama of this thread...
Here's another question for you mr. dm. How do you feel about players buying partially charged wands at pro-rated prices?
I ask because, while I am willing to serve as party healer, I'm not keen on blowing nearly a sixth of Tylara's starting gold on a wand of cure light wounds. I'd be willing to pay 375 for a wand with 25 charges and spend the another 375 on an arcane spell of some sort that was also half full.
Don't you mean the HILLARY CLINTON of this thread?? :D

Partially charged wands at pro-rated prices are almost allowed: here's how it works: pro-rate for the number of charges, and then add 50gp.
 
Last edited:






renau1g said:
My dear Leif, you are ever the magnanimous GM/DM.
(See my kissing up isn't reserved for Scotley ;))
Scott DeWar said:
And so very humble too, I might add
Thank you, My Subservient Thralls! :D
Killing your treasured characters will now give me that much more nefarious pleasure! :D
 

Leif said:
Thank you, My Subservient Thralls! :D
Killing your treasured characters will now give me that much more nefarious pleasure! :D

gereeeaaattt....

still working on Capizzio. spell lists and scrolls right now.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top