This can't possibly turn out badly.For example the Spider Cows and Spider Goats that scientists have created, through genetic manipulation, to produce silk along with their milk.
This can't possibly turn out badly.For example the Spider Cows and Spider Goats that scientists have created, through genetic manipulation, to produce silk along with their milk.
This can't possibly turn out badly.
View attachment 291122
My wife puts that stuff in her coffee.You need your daily dose of silk
There is also the possibility that the signals we are looking for may not be emitted by alien civilisations. We started looking for deliberate emission on the Hydrogen line because we speculated that aliens would be seeking communication. But really we were like the drunk looking for his keys under the street light (because that is where the light is). Even at the time we could only detect stuff like the military early warning radar at thousands of light years (may be some of the bigger TV broadcasts).The problem with the Fermi paradox is that it hinges on the belief that we've looked and we haven't seen them. That's just not true. We have scanned an immeasurably small percentage of the sky for signals that don't propagate particularly well with tools not actually built to find what they are looking for.
We are getting a little better with projects meant to start looking for high intensity laser communications. And we are working on tools to examine exoplanet atmospheres for signs of life and industrial activity, but we are a very long way from being able to legitimately wonder "where is everyone?"
Now consider that our own "radio bubble" within which some other species might notice us is less than 260 light years across, for our weakest signals. no one is noticing us.There is also the possibility that the signals we are looking for may not be emitted by alien civilisations. We started looking for deliberate emission on the Hydrogen line because we speculated that aliens would be seeking communication. But really we were like the drunk looking for his keys under the street light (because that is where the light is). Even at the time we could only detect stuff like the military early warning radar at thousands of light years (may be some of the bigger TV broadcasts).
Now military radar technology has changed drastically and emits at much lower powers. Same with all other broadcasts and a lot of signal traffic is in orbit pointed to earth.
Our current tech would have trouble spotting us at hundreds of light years.
In my opinion, true SETI will require the ability to do atmospheric spectroscopy at the galaxy scale. I am not even sure we could confidently say that there is no Dyson Sphere/Swarm in the Milky Way.
That is the maximum detectable bubble, since we have been only transmitting for about 120/30 years or so. The Cold War Era of high power radar is roughly 1950 to 1980'ies when they started to rely more on satellites and were switching radar to spread spectrum phase array setups that used less power. (I am going from memory here and am not current with the timeline).Now consider that our own "radio bubble" within which some other species might notice us is less than 260 light years across, for our weakest signals. no one is noticing us.
For those interested even further, Coast to Coast AM has some really sober... in- informative, and en-... pbtpbtpbtpbtpbt HAHAHAHA!For those interested, the Cool Worlds youtube channel has some really sober, informative and engaging videos about big space physics and how that might interact with SETI.
That’s never been a thing outside strawman accusations.Certain sides of American politics claim that we must believe all whistleblowers- until things blew against them. So then we are left with trust but verify.
Complex biochemicals for one thing. Program a living population's DNA and they can produce all sorts of specialised materials at scales that artificial production would struggle to match. We've done it more crudely since prehistoric times, from when we first started breeding domestic livestock and crops. These days we can tailor crops to make complex pharmaceuticals, and animals to grow replacement organs.
Now imagine being able to do it far more precisely, for a far wider selection of products, through genetic tailoring. Then imagine gaining access to a whole new ecosystem that you don't have to worry about messing up because you don't live in it, and which is different enough from your own that you can use it to build all new products.
If they can travel the universe and colonize other planets, they almost certainly have more efficient ways to produce organic chemical compounds.It means anything that living beings can produce naturally, plus everything they could be engineered to produce. Basically, anything involving complex organic chemistry.
One of the things I hated about Star Trek: Voyager was the bad guys from season 1, the Kazon, were experiencing a water shortage. These dudes had the ability to move faster than the speed of light but couldn't figure out how to throw hydrogen and oxygen together to make water?You don't think a species capable of interstellar travel can engineer the air they need to breath? If not it might make interstellar travel a bit difficult.