:( Who else is unhappy that XP comments are now showing up in the post?

[BryonD]

Here's your XP awarded list:

site:http://www.enworld.org/forum/members/ BryonD - Google Search

However, I'm not going to sort it for most recent.

Cheers, -- N

Still not right.
I think at this point you have pretty well demonstrated that it wasn't right there for the taking.

Edit: It is worth noting how quickly we went from a proclamation of "mildly inconvenient" to not worth the effort. I'm not sure if you really didn't want to bother, or the fact that the links don't provide the information you suggest is the reason. But sorting all those links would be more than mildly inconvenient either way. And that is just to fail in an effort to track down XP from one single user. To track everyone would be physically impossible.

 

[Nifft]

Still not right.
I think at this point you have pretty well demonstrated that it wasn't right there for the taking.

Edit: It is worth noting how quickly we went from a proclamation of "mildly inconvenient" to not worth the effort. I'm not sure if you really didn't want to bother, or the fact that the links don't provide the information you suggest is the reason.

If you're really not sure what info the links provide, just follow one (... and not just the top one). Your public rep activity is all there.

For me, mildly inconvenient genuinely isn't worth the effort. I'd make a terrible stalker. (And that side of the problem isn't much easier now: seeing who you give rep to is essentially the exact same google search.)

The other side of the issue -- when the person being stalked / grudged / whatever'd is the recipient -- was trivial before, and still is.

Cheers, -- N

 

[Lanefan]

I always thought that under the old system XP comments were the same as private messages i.e. viewable only by the recipient.

::shrug:: learn something every day, I guess.

Lan-"finally a swashbuckler"-efan

 

[vagabundo]

looks like you can give neg-rep now. Well at least the mods can. Oh dear; can of worms meet the black pot.

 

[Piratecat]

looks like you can give neg-rep now. Well at least the mods can. Oh dear; can of worms meet the black pot.

Really? Can anyone but moderators?

By the way, I flirted briefly with the neg-rep system for moderation last night, and we won't be using it for that.

 

[Nifft]

By the way, I flirted briefly with the neg-rep system for moderation last night, and we won't be using it for that.

IMHO the only time the neg-rep system should be used is to "reward" people who beg for rep. It's not against the rules to beg for rep, so it's not like you need to take formal moderation action, but it is something we ought to discourage.

Moderators hit hard enough to make begging for rep unprofitable.

 

[Piratecat]

Yeah; turns out that admins are -20. Booyah!

 

[renau1g]

Uhh...is there anything I can get for you sir? A glass of water...please don't hit me

 

[Wayside]

Yeah; turns out that admins are -20. Booyah!

I have resist neg-rep 20!

On a serious note: are there plans to factor ignore lists into rep comments? Right now I'm seeing edition war-ish posts, and then right underneath them is a bunch of people I have ignored saying "absolutely!" and "tell 'em Steve-Dave!" and what not.

 

[Nifft]

On a serious note: are there plans to factor ignore lists into rep comments? Right now I'm seeing edition war-ish posts, and then right underneath them is a bunch of people I have ignored saying "absolutely!" and "tell 'em Steve-Dave!" and what not.

Edition warring sounds like something you might want to report.

Cheers, -- N