Scribe
Legend
You don't have to do anything. You could play poker instead.
Very true, but did the rule books tell us we could?
You don't have to do anything. You could play poker instead.
Rule 0.Very true, but did the rule books tell us we could?
Rule 0.
The Duergar are pretty true to stereotype, but I am talking about the other "regular" surface Dwarf NPCs. There are a bunch of them in act 3 and none that I can remember have beards.I mean...the Duergar are pretty true. Then there's one in Act 3, but I took this to be a species question.
I think you might need to define what dwarves are, then take traits and either highlight them or oppose them. To me dwarves are:
I could probably think of more, but you might ignore the hills and mountains and create a desert dwelling clan that is known to be skilled mounted warriors (maybe giant lizards, maybe camels) and skilled craftsmen creating incredible glass products from sand located in their home.
- Related to stone, hills, and mountains
- Orderly/law focused
- Clan/family based
- Skilled craftsmen
- Skilled warriors
Maybe a clan has taken to the seas, a chaotic society where strength and cunning gets you a leadership position. Still skilled warriors, there homes are found on the coasts and ships at sea.
Maybe they're skilled wizards, known for their spellcasting and the magical artifacts that come from that knowledge. This one is probably a trope as well, dwarves forged magical artifacts in Norse mythology, it's one reason why I always found it weird that they couldn't be wizards back in the day.
This isnt an issue with D&D though, its an issue with writers, players, DM's, whoever. The system isnt preventing anything, it hasnt for decades.
ASI, Alignment, Culture, Species, whatever. None of that is a straightjacket, hasnt been for longer than most 5e players have existed on the planet.
Want to have a suave, nature loving, CN dwarf Bard with dump stats of Str and Con? Go nuts.