Why can't you idiots design polls properly?

My polls are perfect

This concept (yes, I realize it’s humor) is why I try to always make polls with a range between 0 and 10 -- 11 options, including a dead center item. I identify the two extremes and the exact middle, and leave the ranges between open to each poster’s own interpretation.

So, most of my polls actually do list your specific situation – at 3 or 7. :-)

Quasqueton
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Nomad4life said:
Can you do that with a Hulking Hurler build?
No. But the Pelting Pooper PrC probably applies.

I get furious when people insult or make fun of polls. I'm of Polish persuasion myself, and it seems SO offensi. . .

. . . what?

Oh. Never mind. Carry on.
 

Why give people the option to vote in the first place? It's not like their views actually matter. All polls should have the option to "fill in results" when they are created to reflect the outcome that the Original Poster is actually after, rather than what is randomly generated by a load of strange people from all over the globe who don't actually bother reading what the poll is about (aside from the often mis-leading title).
 


You need to add a poll to this thread. I'm going to choose the "because nobody really gives a flying leap through a rolling donut" option.

-The Gneech :cool:
 

I roll my eyes at a lot of the "you forgot this option" and "what about 'it depends'?!?!?"

I think these posters just want to seem smart uber complex.
 

BiggusGeekus said:
This rant should have been a poll.

We could have answered the question by selecting one of the following radio buttons

* Because I ate dumb flakes for breakfast
* Because I am a being of pure energy and I keep forgeting you fleshbound mortals can't read minds
* Because I didn't put much time in effort into it as in my other browser window I was surfing Luis Royo's site.
* Lemon Curry

Huh? What? Why no...no I didnt go to Royo...why do you ask?
 

Remove ads

Top