Sacrosanct
Legend
It's one of your 'facts'.
When you say someone doesn't have the mental equipment to engage in a debate, that's literally the definition of attacking them personally.
I don't make strawman arguments - so if you advocate people wasting their personal time mulling over thread posts by others to prove their point like they are writing a paper on it - pull all the non-existent strawman arguments you claim I repeatedly make and publish a book or something..
Just in this thread alone, you said I made the argument that giant eagles in Arabian myth benevolently rescued the sailors. I did not make that argument. I said they rescued them. Which they did. Benevolently or accidentally is a distinction I never made. And then just above, you said I always accuse people of attacking me personally if they don't agree with me. I never made that argument either, and when I asked you to show examples if it does happen all the time like you accused, all you have is this response. No examples noted.
Personally, I'm getting the impression that you're so caught up in your own self importance and conceit and contempt for anyone you think isn't as smart as you, that you're engaging in the most basic of fallacies, and slinging out accusations that you can't back up.
Using big words doesn't win over an argument. Avoiding the most basic of fallacies and backing up your accusations does.