Rechan said:The question should be: Why don't Hogoblins rule the world?
They're militaristic, capable, and they likely breed with either the same speed of humans, or faster like goblins. Not only that, they're slavers; so they can assimilate other races into their ranks to do the job so more hobgoblins can be pulling their weight militarily.
Shortman McLeod said:So why don't all the dragons that have come to maximum power rule the world?
Cause it's a game. They never got a whole continent, so no army bonuses. Asia, 7 armies, Europe 5 and Africa 3. But they just never got a whole one. Same thing happened to Alexander the Great: Tried to make it to Australia and couldn't get past Siam.Woas said:Cause..... it's a game?![]()
Why don't the Romans still rule the world?
Interesting notion, but the problem comes from the fact that in a fantasy world, more humans kill more giants or dragons than ants kill humans in our world. With the right conditions, ants could kill a person. But it's a lot easier in D&D for four humans to kill a giant.InVinoVeritas said:So, why haven't the giants enslaved us? For the same reason we haven't enslaved the ants. It's not worth it to us. Sure, we use ants from time to time--we need them in films, kids have ant farms, etc., but we don't run around forcing them to do our bidding against their will. We'll kill them without remorse if they invade our homes, but they can usually live in our front yards just fine.
I would have left off the smiley.Nifft said:They do.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.