• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Why no love for Dragonlance? [slightly rantish]

Re: One other factor..

Lord Zardoz said:
So if the best adventures you could run in Dragonlance had no real reason to happen in Dragonlance, why use Dragonlance in the first place?

What he said. I think this pretty much sums that position up.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Look, I'm going to take this as personal preference. Personally, I'd rather have options available, even if I don't use all of them. Just because you don't find DL a suitable setting, doesn't mean ALL the other gamers feel the same way as you do.

For fair comparison, perhaps one should open discussions about why no love for Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Rokugan, Kara-Tur, Zakhara, Kingdom of Kalamar, etc.
 

Ranger REG said:
Look, I'm going to take this as personal preference. Personally, I'd rather have options available, even if I don't use all of them. Just because you don't find DL a suitable setting, doesn't mean ALL the other gamers feel the same way as you do.

For fair comparison, perhaps one should open discussions about why no love for Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Rokugan, Kara-Tur, Zakhara, Kingdom of Kalamar, etc.

Perhaps one should. They all have their good and bad points, like DL and every other D&D fabrication. No harm in discussing those things. I don't play in Dragonlance but it's still my favorite non-homebrew setting, and the only reason I ever checked D&D out in the first place. No other D&D books I've ever read would have persuaded me to play the game the way Dragonlance did, not even Tolkien made me as curious about fantasy; and since all my gaming friends got into D&D through me, that's 12 people who owe our years of gaming together directly to those first 6 books. We all read them and we all loved them.
 

Remove ads

Top