Wizards designer posts - Andy Collins

MerricB

Eternal Optimist
Supporter
Every so often, I go around the Wizards boards looking for information from the actual Game Designers. Mostly I look for miniature information (and compile that on my webpage), but I do look for more general D&D info as well.

Here's a bunch of posts made by Andy Collins over the past few months.

The Medium Save Progession

Querent - The Medium save was invented a long time ago, and it seems WotC didn't have fractional progressions in mind when they did so.

Andy Collins: As the person who created the Medium save progression for Star Wars when I was still a neophyte designer, I can say that's pretty much dead-on accurate. The design team wanted something between the polar extremes of "Good" and "Poor" saves, and that progression split the difference.

I remember, some time after I created the progression, Jonathan Tweet asked me what formula I'd used to build it. After I stared blankly at him for a few seconds, he realized that the 3E designers *hadn't ever told anyone* that there was a formula hiding behind the good & bad save progressions.

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=3635938#post3635938

(I love that one. All the great design philosophy of 3E unravels if the basics aren't explained! I felt that about monster design - thankfully the 3.5E MM makes it much clearer - MB).

Libris Mortis Information

Querent - October is so far away, sigh. I wish Collins or Cordell would be so kind as to give us a tidbit, just a tiny morsel from the book?

Andy Collins: Do you mean something like "DMs can look forward to getting full game statistics for dozens of sample undead using the templates from the Monster Manual, making it super-easy to drop a bunch of cool zombies or a nasty vampire into their campaign"?

Does that qualify as a morsel?

Querent - Well yeah Andy but is there stuff about Deities that favor undead in there too?

Andy Collins: The original request was for "a" morsel, so that's all yer gettin' from me. ;)

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=3651361#post3651361

(A frequent poster on ENworld is the Querent!)

Subsitution Levels in the Planar Handbook:

Andy Collins: The sub levels in Planar Handbook represent our "first shot" at this new mechanic. They don't always hit the mark we were aiming at, but overall I think they represent an exciting new option for players to explore (and one we'll continue to explore in the future...).

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=3942789#post3942789

Planar Domains:

Andy Collins: I'm glad you like the planar domains.

It's true that we could have done more, but we felt the list there was enough to get players & DMs started.

Wouldn't surprise me if someone made the effort to write up more in the future, but it probably won't be in a Wizards D&D product unless/until we revisit the planes specifically.

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=3935151#post3935151

Cheers!
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Merrick reads the WotC boards so that we don't have to.

You are a patient man to be able to tolerate all the noise and still find some good info there. Thanks for sharing.
 

JoeBlank said:
Merrick reads the WotC boards so that we don't have to.

You are a patient man to be able to tolerate all the noise and still find some good info there. Thanks for sharing.


you could've asked me...

i live over there. :D
 

MerricB said:
The Medium Save Progession

Querent - The Medium save was invented a long time ago, and it seems WotC didn't have fractional progressions in mind when they did so.

Andy Collins: As the person who created the Medium save progression for Star Wars when I was still a neophyte designer, I can say that's pretty much dead-on accurate. The design team wanted something between the polar extremes of "Good" and "Poor" saves, and that progression split the difference.

I remember, some time after I created the progression, Jonathan Tweet asked me what formula I'd used to build it. After I stared blankly at him for a few seconds, he realized that the 3E designers *hadn't ever told anyone* that there was a formula hiding behind the good & bad save progressions.

For frick's sake! How on earth did Andy Collins ever get into WotC R&D? The guy apparently can't reverse-engineer a nut off a bolt!
 

hong said:
For frick's sake! How on earth did Andy Collins ever get into WotC R&D? The guy apparently can't reverse-engineer a nut off a bolt!


i think that is exactly what several of us told him at Gen Con last year.


IYKWIMAIKYD
 

Can we toss a comment about a few of them? :p

MerricB said:
The Medium Save Progession

Haven't seen SW, would be interesting what is the intermediate progression between 1/3 and 2+1/2... perhaps 1+2/5? It could have been a good occasion to slightly differentiate about core classes since the start of 3rd edition, or eventually to fine-tuning them when 3.5 came out.

For example, an intermediate Fort save could have been appropriate for Clerics and Druids, while an intermediate Will for Paladins...

MerricB said:
Libris Mortis Information

Sounds very in line with Draconomicon and not a bad idea :)

MerricB said:
Subsitution Levels in the Planar Handbook:

About this I have already said before that IMO it is an unnecessary addition to the rules, at least the examples I read about until now could have been simply done as switching a class feature with something equivalent, which definitely doesn't need a new mechanical concept. I probably don't understand what's the "mark" they're aiming at...
 

MerricB said:
I remember, some time after I created the progression, Jonathan Tweet asked me what formula I'd used to build it. After I stared blankly at him for a few seconds, he realized that the 3E designers *hadn't ever told anyone* that there was a formula hiding behind the good & bad save progressions.
Heh. Maybe they should've told the modern d20 designers, too, that there is actually a formula behind the save progressions. ;)

Bye
Thanee
 

Man. I didn't think my maths were superstrong, but, er, it's not THAT hard to figure out the save formula...
 

Li Shenron said:
Haven't seen SW, would be interesting what is the intermediate progression between 1/3 and 2+1/2... perhaps 1+2/5?

Got it in one.

Have you considered working for WotC R&D?
 


Remove ads

Top