Worst "science" movie

I saw the title and my first thought was "The Core", my second thought was "Armageddon". It should have been no surprise that it was that way to everybody else.

Yeah, Total Recall had that subtle little twist where you were never quite sure if the movie was real or not.

The basic plot of The Matrix bugged me on a Laws of Thermodynamics level, that how could they use human metabolisms as a power source, without losing power by whatever means they could have to feed humans. You can't gain energy like that. Then I read what the Wachowskis's original plans for the movie were but the studio thought it would be way too dense and incomprehensible to the moviegoing public: the minds of the enslaved humans were being used like a distributed computing network, their subconscious minds providing much of the raw computing power the machine empire used, using the unique properties of organic brains as a giant computer. Warner Brothers thought nobody would ever understand that, but using people as batteries, that made sense (supposedly).

The basic plot of "Star Trek: Generations" also bothers me, since the basic idea of blowing up stars to get rid of their gravity well doesn't work, the mass remains the same even if you force the star to noval (and the end where a chemically propelled rocket takes only a few seconds to go from a habitable planets surface to a yellow star, which you see the rocket visibly fly all the way, and the explosion of the star is visible on the planet's surface only seconds after launch.)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Dagger75 said:
The Day After Tomorrow

Now I know how fast you have to run to out run cold.
LOL, that was my immediate answer as soon as I saw this thread title. I'll go you one better though: the friggin' weather CHASED THEM.

I'd have paid to hear someone say "Hurry! The climate's catching up with us!"

Of course, if you just put your brain in neutral and sit back and enjoy the dumb fun ... it still sucks. Screw that movie.
 

I haven't seen it, but I've been told that on the commentary track of the "Total Recall" special limited edition DVD, Paul Verhoeven talks about this very thing, that many people missed that subtle little twist which makes the entire movie completely different.

Well, the neat thing about the movie IMO is that it left the truth open to interpretation. Yeah, maybe it is all a simulation judging by what he told the Rekall doctors he wanted to see, or maybe it was real and he told them all those details because subconsciously he still remembered these things from the first time around.

I haven't watched the DVD. If Verhoeven comes right out and says if it's real or not on the commentary, I'll be very disappointed.
 

The Core and Armageddon get a slight reprieve, in my mind.

Armageddon has some bad sicence, but I don't think it's really trying to be a sicence movie. It is more an adventure flick, and with a goodly portion of charactgerization from the actors, it was at least entertaining. The Core (though I haven't seen it) I will let off because of the Unobtanium reference - a dead giveaway that it knows it is bad.

The Day After Tomorrow, however, is a horrendous waste of existance. I don't think there's a good argument that it doesn't have a political message, but it lies like a rug while delivering it. That's not defensible. Even less when the movie's just plain boring.
 


DreadPirateMurphy said:
Note: I exempt superhero and fantasy films, since the stretching of the laws of physics is one of the basic premises of the genres.

The one thing that's really ever bothered me science-wise was the fusion reactor in Spider-Man 2.

"...so, you can drown a fusion reaction in water? And all the iron flying into it due to the magnetic field isn't shutting the fusion reaction down? What the?"

I know, I know, superhero movie, but still.

Brad
 


Firebird said:
I'd have to probably say, "The Core". I laughed out loud watching that one. Super strong ships hull to withstand the heat and crushing pressure of the earth's core and then the crew goes outside of it while in the mantle. That's like climbing out a submarine at crush depth in a wetsuit. An insult to intelligence.

Hmm, I wonder where jonrog1 is.

wingsandsword said:
The basic plot of The Matrix bugged me on a Laws of Thermodynamics level, that how could they use human metabolisms as a power source, without losing power by whatever means they could have to feed humans. You can't gain energy like that.

What I love about it is right afterwards Morpheus mentions that the machines have a form of nuclear fusion.

Then I read what the Wachowskis's original plans for the movie were but the studio thought it would be way too dense and incomprehensible to the moviegoing public: the minds of the enslaved humans were being used like a distributed computing network, their subconscious minds providing much of the raw computing power the machine empire used, using the unique properties of organic brains as a giant computer. Warner Brothers thought nobody would ever understand that, but using people as batteries, that made sense (supposedly).

Damn, that would have been much cooler, and more believable.
 

cignus_pfaccari said:
The one thing that's really ever bothered me science-wise was the fusion reactor in Spider-Man 2.

"...so, you can drown a fusion reaction in water? And all the iron flying into it due to the magnetic field isn't shutting the fusion reaction down? What the?"

I know, I know, superhero movie, but still.

Brad

Same thing with Superman. Turning back time by spinning the planet backward? Not even The Day After Tomorrow was that dumb!
 


Remove ads

Top