D&D General WotC’s Official Announcement About Diversity, Races, and D&D

Following up on recent discussions on social media, WotC has made an official announcement about diversity and the treatment of ‘race’ in D&D.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Following up on recent discussions on social media, WotC has made an official announcement about diversity and the treatment of ‘race’ in D&D. Notably, the word ‘race’ is not used; in its place are the words ‘people’ and 'folk'.

2A4C47E3-EAD6-4461-819A-3A42B20ED62A.png


 PRESS RELEASE


Dungeons & Dragons teaches that diversity is strength, for only a diverse group of adventurers can overcome the many challenges a D&D story presents. In that spirit, making D&D as welcoming and inclusive as possible has moved to the forefront of our priorities over the last six years. We’d like to share with you what we’ve been doing, and what we plan to do in the future to address legacy D&D content that does not reflect who we are today. We recognize that doing this isn’t about getting to a place where we can rest on our laurels but continuing to head in the right direction. We feel that being transparent about it is the best way to let our community help us to continue to calibrate our efforts.

One of the explicit design goals of 5th edition D&D is to depict humanity in all its beautiful diversity by depicting characters who represent an array of ethnicities, gender identities, sexual orientations, and beliefs. We want everyone to feel at home around the game table and to see positive reflections of themselves within our products. “Human” in D&D means everyone, not just fantasy versions of northern Europeans, and the D&D community is now more diverse than it’s ever been.

Throughout the 50-year history of D&D, some of the peoples in the game—orcs and drow being two of the prime examples—have been characterized as monstrous and evil, using descriptions that are painfully reminiscent of how real-world ethnic groups have been and continue to be denigrated. That’s just not right, and it’s not something we believe in. Despite our conscious efforts to the contrary, we have allowed some of those old descriptions to reappear in the game. We recognize that to live our values, we have to do an even better job in handling these issues. If we make mistakes, our priority is to make things right.

Here’s what we’re doing to improve:
  • We present orcs and drow in a new light in two of our most recent books, Eberron: Rising from the Last War and Explorer's Guide to Wildemount. In those books, orcs and drow are just as morally and culturally complex as other peoples. We will continue that approach in future books, portraying all the peoples of D&D in relatable ways and making it clear that they are as free as humans to decide who they are and what they do.
  • When every D&D book is reprinted, we have an opportunity to correct errors that we or the broader D&D community discovered in that book. Each year, we use those opportunities to fix a variety of things, including errors in judgment. In recent reprintings of Tomb of Annihilation and Curse of Strahd, for example, we changed text that was racially insensitive. Those reprints have already been printed and will be available in the months ahead. We will continue this process, reviewing each book as it comes up for a reprint and fixing such errors where they are present.
  • Later this year, we will release a product (not yet announced) that offers a way for a player to customize their character’s origin, including the option to change the ability score increases that come from being an elf, a dwarf, or one of D&D's many other playable folk. This option emphasizes that each person in the game is an individual with capabilities all their own.
  • Curse of Strahd included a people known as the Vistani and featured the Vistani heroine Ezmerelda. Regrettably, their depiction echoes some stereotypes associated with the Romani people in the real world. To rectify that, we’ve not only made changes to Curse of Strahd, but in two upcoming books, we will also show—working with a Romani consultant—the Vistani in a way that doesn’t rely on reductive tropes.
  • We've received valuable insights from sensitivity readers on two of our recent books. We are incorporating sensitivity readers into our creative process, and we will continue to reach out to experts in various fields to help us identify our blind spots.
  • We're proactively seeking new, diverse talent to join our staff and our pool of freelance writers and artists. We’ve brought in contributors who reflect the beautiful diversity of the D&D community to work on books coming out in 2021. We're going to invest even more in this approach and add a broad range of new voices to join the chorus of D&D storytelling.
And we will continue to listen to you all. We created 5th edition in conversation with the D&D community. It's a conversation that continues to this day. That's at the heart of our work—listening to the community, learning what brings you joy, and doing everything we can to provide it in every one of our books.

This part of our work will never end. We know that every day someone finds the courage to voice their truth, and we’re here to listen. We are eternally grateful for the ongoing dialog with the D&D community, and we look forward to continuing to improve D&D for generations to come.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
This process is tedious, and requires a lot of human supervision, and is hard to get right. Many companies may find it is not economical for materials that they don't expect to sell well.
I receive PDFs of one page press releases all the time where all the text is a single image. That's not finding something too time consuming -- it would be faster and easier to just type the original text into an email, after all -- that's a real lack of giving a crap about anyone other than whatever manager loves PDFs. (And even as a sighted person, having it all in an image means I can't copy and paste text to quote it, so I'm less likely to use anything from the press release, so they're shooting themselves in the foot there.)
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
Cats kill for fun, are they evil since they lack a moral compass?
I love cats, and own an elderly diabetic one who costs me an arm and a leg to keep healthy-ish. But they are 100% evil. The 5E Book of Vile Darkness could just be full of cat-related content and it would totally check out. (And would avoid the 3E spectacle of "we're not comfortable with some folks' sex practices, so we're going to say that they're eeeeeevil.")
 

Var

Explorer
That's coming in afterwords and trying to explain what the heck "black supremacy" was. His initial statement wasn't clear and certainly wasn't an obvious call for "two-way dialogue."


No one's ancestry makes them magically immune to having dumb, or worse, opinions. I feel like celebrity culture, if it's good for nothing else, has been a good way of teaching us all that.
Since he is pretty active on Twitter and a person of color, I'm just making a ballpark guess and claim he saw a good bunch of tweets from other people of color. Looks too me like he saw one too many "kill all pigs" posts and was trying to be a decent human being.
Don't know if you remember how the initial BLM movement years ago wasn't received well. Because its extreme outliers shed a bad light on the whole movement and swung public opinion against it.

Your ancestry also doesn't make you magically guilty. Doesn't matter to me if someone's grandpa was guarding a Gulag in the Soviet Union or a General in the Japanese Empire. It's not their duty to raise awareness, it's enough for me if they become decent members of society in their own way.
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
And any new take on drow is welcome, because I have never been able to wrap my head around these massive cities where everyone is hardcore Chaotic Evil all day long.
It kind of worked with the Vault of the Drow, since that society was in crisis, with the matriarchy being under attack by an even more nihilistic religion. It was supposed to be a mess. (It was also, as I recall, a far smaller city than the 2E ones in the Forgotten Realms.)
 

Remathilis

Legend
At one point during the DnD Beyond playtest, they toyed with the idea of class giving a boost to your "prime requisite" score in addition to race, so an elf might give you +1 dex, but cleric gives your +1 wis. It might be an idea worth revisiting.

Bbn +1 Str, +1 Con
Brd +2 Cha
Clr +2 Wis
Druid +1 Wis, +1 Con
Ftr +2 Str OR Dex
Mnk +1 Dex, +1 Wis
Pal +1 Str, +1 Cha
Rgr +1 Str, +1 Dex
Rog +2 Dex
Sor +2 Cha
Wlk +1 Cha, +1 Con
Wiz +1 Int

Human +1 to any 2
Elf +1 Dex or Int
Dwf +1 Str or Con
Halfling +1 Dex or Cha
Gnome +1 Int or Cha
Half-elf +1 to any one
Half-orc +1 to Str or Con
Dragonborn +1 Str or Cha
Tiefling +1 Dex or Cha
 

Bolares

Hero
WotC could do is to make sure if they replace or update their PDF files that they're not lower quality, I've had versions of PDFs for 2nd edition that were mostly usable, replaced with files that either lost their optical character recognition (OCR) or had it severely reduced. Making it completely unusable, that's really not good enough.

One clear thing they could do is warn a person if a file isn't going to be screen reader friendly. I've asked OBS and WoTC to do this, oddly those requests are met with silence. Recently, I even sent a message to OBS support with a list of WotC classic titles I wanted to buy, but had no idea if they were screen reader friendly, they said they'd contact the publisher and get back to me... I don't expect to get an answer this time either.

I've always known that DM's Guild community content was a risky thing to buy, so I tend to avoid it for the most part. No offense to anyone who creates it, but if I have been burnt many times by community content with the text in the PDF is just an image rather than true text that can be selected and read.
Is there anything us as a community can do to help?
 


Chaderick

Explorer
Are you a proponent of the Satanic Panic?

You mean the era of my life when my Sunday School teacher told me that I was going to hell because I played a glorified board game? When my sixth grade teacher pretended to be interested in my hobby to secretly vet whether I should be sent to counseling because I liked to imagine I was an elf fighter/magic-user killing zombies and golems? When kids who wanted to be my friends weren't allowed to come to my birthday parties because my favorite movies involved swords and sorcery, like Beastmaster and the Sword and the Sorcerer?

In a word, no. I'm not a proponent of that.

In fact, I believe that providing a game environment where people treat each other with greater respect regarding all aspects of their lives could have gone a long way toward avoiding the Satanic Panic in the first place. The cause of the Satanic Panic was a combination of bigotry and ignorance. In an era where we're one tweet away from burning people as witches, I firmly believe that the more we can distance ourselves from both bigotry AND ignorance, the safer we all are.

That means all the things that WoTC has done to date, including these recent changes to acknowledge what people have been saying about the vistani for decades now. Dungeons & Dragons has always been cheered as a way for the "quiet kids" to find friends. These days, it's a way for just about anybody to find friends, and that gives these changes the capability that I mentioned--the capability of making a positive change in this world by pushing back the bigotry and ignorance that are still just too damn pervasive.
 

Whizbang Dustyboots

Gnometown Hero
Honestly, instead of knew jerk reactions that produce two competing products, the original 1st Printing of 5th Edition Players Hand Book with the word "race" and a later reprinting with the word "people" just announcing a 6th Edition and the new direction is so much neater.
Find all, replace all, done. It's pretty easy.

Harder is WotC's reluctance to issue a 5.1 Players Handbook, cleaning up the Ranger, etc., which is one of the main drivers for the Big Book of Alternate Class and Racial Abilities, since, several years on, it's clear that some of the stuff in every PHB is not as good as it ought to be.

But from a market fragmentation standpoint, it's not hard to see why WotC doesn't to repeat the 3.5 edition.
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top