delericho
Legend
Sitara said:I only own the core MM. I'm thinking of getting another, which is the best? I was thinking mm5, since its supposed to be an influence on 4E, but I've heard great things about mm4 as well. Which is better?
Of the Monster Manuals, I have had the most use out of MMIV and MMV. MMIV was widely criticised for the pre-statted 'advanced' monsters, but I have found those to be extremely useful. (The book also uses up a lot of page-count on the Spawn of Tiamat, of which I was not fond.) MMV also contains pre-statted 'advanced' monsters, which is good, but I've found those to be slightly less useful overall, probably due to the particular selection of creatures.
One thing to note is that the two most recent MMs seem to contain monsters that are tougher for their CR than monsters in MM1-3. I think the monsters are built to compensate for the greater optimisation of recent PCs and/or the use of supplemental materials. This, in itself, is no bad thing, except that I had been in the habit of boosting the ELs a little to compensate, and doing that with MMIV monsters led to a couple of unexpected TPKs.
demiurge1138 said:If adventures are your thing, go for Expedition to the Ruins of Castle Greyhawk. It's old-school fun of the first caliber.
Actually, I found both of the "Expedition to" books that I own (the other being "Demonweb Pits") to be disappointing. It's possible that I had excessive expectations based on the authors' names and past record, or it's possible that I just don't get the nostalgia having missed 1st Edition. Or it's possible that they just weren't very good adventures. Whatever the reason, I was unimpressed.