Dire Bare
Legend
In my experience, when someone sums up an argument with, "I'm a lawyer" they are usually trying to convince me of something ridiculous. I'm getting that vibe here. But then again, I've read of some pretty ridiculous cases that did go to court, so I guess you never can tell.Jeff Wilder said:DDI was (and still is) advertised as a draw, available immediately, to sell core rulebooks.
This is not simply a matter of vaporware. It is, at the very least, arguable that DDI was a promised part of a product -- the core rulebooks -- that was not delivered.
Proving damages is easy: "If it weren't for the unequivocal statements that I'd be able to play D&D via DDI, with my friends that lives around the country, I would not have bought the rulebooks."
An analogy: a high end car company advertises that buyers of their soon-to-be-released hybrid will be able to immediately subscribe to highly anticipated SOTA satellite services (for the hybrid) of various sorts. After thousands of the cars are sold, the company announces that none of the subscription services will be available for months.
If you don't see legal liability there, well, it's a damned good thing you're not a lawyer, because you suck at it. (I am, BTW, a lawyer.)
There's not really any question in WotC's case, and starting RSN, you can expect to see some serious legal scrambling.
I'll believe your claim when I see it happen, which I'm pretty confident I won't. And if this scenario actually did make it into a courtroom and was successful, I would ruthlessly mock all those involved (not that they'd care, of course) for being ridiculously litigious.
It'd get some good press I imagine, though.