occam
Hero
Techdirt is a news commentary blog that focuses on a number of issues, but a main one is IP management and dealing with the digital age. A common theme that I've seen show up is slapping your content behind a paywall is generally a terrible idea. Another major point is that by connecting with fans and giving them a reason to buy rather than worrying about such issues of infringment (commonly known as piracy) is a better way to make money.
Y'know, like what Paizo is doing.
I won't address the issue of Paizo being more or less innovative; plenty of other folks have taken that on, and I really appreciate Paizo for what they do well.
But comparing Paizo to WotC on the paywall issue like this is preposterous. Paizo gives nothing away for free, while WotC regularly post quite extensive free-to-all previews of upcoming products, posts free articles, provides free adventure play experiences in D&D Encounters, etc. This is not a comparison that benefits Paizo.
As for the paywall, while the quality of products that Paizo makes is commendable, their subscription offerings are far more expensive than the pittance WotC asks for DDI membership. And you have to pay for each of Paizo's public play adventures, while WotC just released their LFR adventures for free.
While WotC isn't perfect, and would probably benefit from the kind of personal connection to their fans that Paizo has engendered, they haven't callously slapped all their content behind a paywall, and do plenty of free promotion to give customers more reasons to buy their stuff.
If I wanted to pirate the PDFs that Paizo releases, I could. But I choose not to, because I feel comfortable giving my money to them and feel that their prices for PDFs to be reasonable. I want Paizo to stay in business.
And if you wanted to pirate the PDFs that WotC releases, you could. They haven't added DRM to the multitude of PDFs they publish through DDI, and because of that, they're freely available on pirate sites to those of lesser moral convictions. They're not even stamped with personally identifiable information, as Paizo does to their PDFs to discourage piracy.
If you had just left Paizo out of it, you could have made your point more strongly. As it is, you've demonstrated that a company can be even less open than WotC and still excite its fanbase.