UngeheuerLich
Legend
That doesn't sound like "we plan to add older editions" to me.
No. But it takes the wind of the sails of those who hyperbole that now OneD&D won't be compatible to 5e anymore.
That doesn't sound like "we plan to add older editions" to me.
I mean, on the one had I'll take them at their word that it's a coding error. The "Settings ever published by Wizards/TSR" field crossed with the "Settings Wizards allows third parties to publish for on DM's Guild" in a bad way.It was a "coding bug" according to DMs Guild but raised a lot of questions:
Cool. Thanks. As noted, not all of those are WotC IP so that makes it a bit...awkward.It was a "coding bug" according to DMs Guild but raised a lot of questions:
I still think it's funny that the ORC will be more closed than Creative Commons, but people will insist it is more openI'm glad the ORC is still in development for folks that want to support open gaming and the OGC ecosystem.
I still think it's funny that the ORC will be more closed than Creative Commons, but people will insist it is more open
Never claimed it would be more open, just better for parsing out open and closed material. Very few people designated their entire product as OGC.I still think it's funny that the ORC will be more closed than Creative Commons, but people will insist it is more open
So you're saying that people can cook the books?But that's not on WoTC. Nor is it a feature of the OGL- after all, they don't have to put any of the remix in the OGC, do they? They can just, um, Monte Cook it.
Why would they do that, though? There's no point as it wouldn't accomplish any of what they were trying to accomplish when this fiasco started.If that's all they cared about, they could have released 5.1 to the CC and still tried to de-auth the 1.0a. The ability to use the 5.1 SRD would be unaffected.
There's a lack of trust that Wizards isn't going to mess with the rest of the tabletop market just because they can.Why would they do that, though? There's no point as it wouldn't accomplish any of what they were trying to accomplish when this fiasco started.
There is no point. I'm just saying that the status of the 5.1 can't be the only thing that matters to WotC, as has been claimed above.Why would they do that, though? There's no point as it wouldn't accomplish any of what they were trying to accomplish when this fiasco started.