Will
First Post
You know, I've bought a lot of splatbooks, and UA was above and beyond my favorite.
Sure, I don't use much of it, but it was so inspiring in suggesting how you could further change and mutate the system into what you want that it effectively functions far better than more utilitarian books. Sure, I use a few things from Complete Warrior fairly often, but it's not such a pervasive useful thing.
As for 'they should get more customers, not publish more books,' that has never, ever, ever worked for RPGs. So you're saying they should destroy themselves out of esthetics?
3.5e actually did a lot better than some editions, as far as power creep; while unbalanced crap did come out, it was more random. That is, in every work there was the chance of one or two things being absurd, so over time, while the number of absurdities did go up, it wasn't a sweeping general thing. And it hasn't been hard to identify the stupid stuff and go 'ok, NO Radiant Servant of Pelor. Just... no.'
Sure, I don't use much of it, but it was so inspiring in suggesting how you could further change and mutate the system into what you want that it effectively functions far better than more utilitarian books. Sure, I use a few things from Complete Warrior fairly often, but it's not such a pervasive useful thing.
As for 'they should get more customers, not publish more books,' that has never, ever, ever worked for RPGs. So you're saying they should destroy themselves out of esthetics?
3.5e actually did a lot better than some editions, as far as power creep; while unbalanced crap did come out, it was more random. That is, in every work there was the chance of one or two things being absurd, so over time, while the number of absurdities did go up, it wasn't a sweeping general thing. And it hasn't been hard to identify the stupid stuff and go 'ok, NO Radiant Servant of Pelor. Just... no.'