Philip
Explorer
IndyPendant said:Sorcerors in 3.5e are in my opinion the only class that wasn’t quite balanced. However, they are hardly the useless classes that (for example) rangers once were in 3.0e. Still, it is hard to refute that they are the weakest of all the ‘core’ classes now, whereas the rest of the classes have achieved as close a balance as they likely ever will.[/i]
The essence of a Sorcerer's weakness is Charisma related - it just doesn't do anything. You could try to compensate this by doling out all kinds of neat abilities, but I am more for fixing Charisma.
You options, while attractive (and I am for the Eschew for believability reasons) make Sorcerer's more alike, they limit choice. No Sorcerer would get the Still Spell feat at lvl 6 when he knows he'll be getting it at lvl 15, 20 or something like that. I am not for that, I like Sorcerers who can choose Still Spell at lvl 6 without feeling penalized.
Edited for spelling.
Last edited: