You mean Stonehenge is just a...a...


log in or register to remove this ad

He seems to have been staring at womens.......bits a bit too much. Dont get me wrong I like ummm womens bits, but I have never seen any that looked like stone henge. Maybe he is seeing some different ones.:rolleyes:
 


I thought that the "experts" already discovered that Stonehenge was not a lone standing stone structure as we see it today, but was just the support columns for a larger wooden building. I even remember seeing some artist conceptions of what the building could have looked like...
 

Ever notice that experts always seem to say that every single ancient society was totally and fully obsessed with Fertility. Every culture - oh, they were obviously very focused on fertility. Oh, fertility must have been central to their culture.



Makes you wonder if in 5000 years some future archeologists will dig up a barbie doll and say... oh yes, those west coast americans.. they had a very fertility-oriented culture. Just look at the exagerated features of this female idol, here...
 



The one thing I learned by being an Anthropology major:

Archelogy can't prove squat. It's just a bunch of people who have ideas and bones to apply them to. :)

Like the Homer Simpson Philosophy of History: "There's no lesson. It's just a bunch of stuff that happened."
 
Last edited:



Remove ads

Top