gideonpepys
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
DM's Notes - The Enemy of My Enemy...
The players went looking for 'a mole' so they found 'a mole'. That leaves two left undiscovered for now. Malthusius has a very high insight, so he should have been able to root out the lot, as he devoted a whole four-hour slot to interviewing each officer. But the questions he was asking and the angle the player wanted to pursue made it difficult for me to imagine him finding anyone but the officer responsible for the leek that morning. Perhaps I am being unfair here?
As for Cippiano, they already have a relationship with him, and had asked him support them against Kell in the past. Cippiano had told them then that he would need to see some hard evidence that the RHC meant business. So I decided that he would contact them on 11th no matter how well the task force was doing, as a reward for maintaining this contact. Turns out they earned 3 strikes then anyway.
I messed up the meeting. Cippiano told them too much - I was extemporizing and concentrating on getting the characterization right, so I saved nothing for Dester Rathtine. Here is another advantage of writing up the sessions each week: once in a blue moon I use them to rewrite history! I simply tell players I effed up, and present the information slightly differently in the write-up. I only do this when there would be no effect on the story. If anything, my goof gave them the opportunity to turn down Cippiano's offer, but still have his information about Kell's escape plan. But they played fair and made the deal anyway. This meant I would have to introduce Dester next week with no extra info to drop. So I just wrote him into the story in the session report and left it at that.
The players went looking for 'a mole' so they found 'a mole'. That leaves two left undiscovered for now. Malthusius has a very high insight, so he should have been able to root out the lot, as he devoted a whole four-hour slot to interviewing each officer. But the questions he was asking and the angle the player wanted to pursue made it difficult for me to imagine him finding anyone but the officer responsible for the leek that morning. Perhaps I am being unfair here?
As for Cippiano, they already have a relationship with him, and had asked him support them against Kell in the past. Cippiano had told them then that he would need to see some hard evidence that the RHC meant business. So I decided that he would contact them on 11th no matter how well the task force was doing, as a reward for maintaining this contact. Turns out they earned 3 strikes then anyway.
I messed up the meeting. Cippiano told them too much - I was extemporizing and concentrating on getting the characterization right, so I saved nothing for Dester Rathtine. Here is another advantage of writing up the sessions each week: once in a blue moon I use them to rewrite history! I simply tell players I effed up, and present the information slightly differently in the write-up. I only do this when there would be no effect on the story. If anything, my goof gave them the opportunity to turn down Cippiano's offer, but still have his information about Kell's escape plan. But they played fair and made the deal anyway. This meant I would have to introduce Dester next week with no extra info to drop. So I just wrote him into the story in the session report and left it at that.