IMO, expect a product like GoDSC, the basic rules with an adventure attached.
Someone (I forget who) suggested in another thread that this could be exactly how D&D5 is incarnated; as adventures with embedded rules. It would be completely unconventional, but preferable, IMHO, to the adventure-lite crunch bloat of 3.X and 4E.IMO, expect a product like GoDSC, the basic rules with an adventure attached.
Ghosts of Dragonspear Castle.GoDSC?
Someone (I forget who) suggested in another thread that this could be exactly how D&D5 is incarnated; as adventures with embedded rules. It would be completely unconventional, but preferable, IMHO, to the adventure-lite crunch bloat of 3.X and 4E.
I say this as someone who has little interest in published adventures, too. But I do recognize their importance to the health of a ruleset.
Ghosts of Dragonspear Castle.
Someone (I forget who) suggested in another thread that this could be exactly how D&D5 is incarnated; as adventures with embedded rules. It would be completely unconventional, but preferable, IMHO, to the adventure-lite crunch bloat of 3.X and 4E.
I say this as someone who has little interest in published adventures, too. But I do recognize their importance to the health of a ruleset.
EDIT: Further thoughts; if WotC goes hard and heavy on adventures, it could be a sign that they are ready to go after the adventure market that Paizo owns lock, stock, and barrel right now. It would take some serious quality for WotC to compete in this space, and I'm seeing signs that they intend to take it seriously. For my part, GoDSC is WAY better than anything they produced for 4E. Time will tell.
Ghosts of Dragonspear Castle.
Never has a statement been so fascinating and yet so unhelpful.