trappedslider
Legend
HBO Max and Warner Bros. Discovery seem to be on fire, and that’s on purpose
The plan is to make a lot of money as cheaply as possible.
www.theverge.com
Canning a movie as a write-off only makes sense if the company sincerely believes it's returns will be less than the the total write off multiplied by the companies tax-rate. The money saved by the write off is always only a mere fraction of the value that is being written off.
WB's tax rate in the last two years was on average 21.2%, so canning a $100 million movie saves them $21.2 million in taxes, that's still -$78.8 million.
Now the $100 million are already spend and gone and the $21.2 million tax saving is a future gain, but that will still only save them money if they fully expect that releasing the movie will earn them less than $25.7 million profit (minus taxes that'd be the break even vs. the write off)
Hasn't stopped them up until this point, so why worry now?Great summary of what the "write off" really means.
I'll throw one other piece into the mix. They're also considering brand value and future movies in the projections. I think there's fear that if they release a stinker now, the next time they want to release a big budget movie (Batman, Batgirl, Justice League, whatever) it will earn less money. How much less? I dunno. But I'm sure it plays into their brand management plans.
Wouldn't we have to also figure in the marketing budget had they gone ahead with the release? Wouldn't their calculus be based on the expected returns being less than the (total write off x tax rate) + marketing?Canning a movie as a write-off only makes sense if the company sincerely believes it's returns will be less than the the total write off multiplied by the companies tax-rate. The money saved by the write off is always only a mere fraction of the value that is being written off.
WB's tax rate in the last two years was on average 21.2%, so canning a $100 million movie saves them $21.2 million in taxes, that's still -$78.8 million.
Now the $100 million are already spend and gone and the $21.2 million tax saving is a future gain, but that will still only save them money if they fully expect that releasing the movie will earn them less than $25.7 million profit (minus taxes that'd be the break even vs. the write off)
Absolutely. Strictly speaking about this movie they must figure that after any required future spendings and incomes are counted, the net result after taxes must be less than 21 million dollars to be worth it.Wouldn't we have to also figure in the marketing budget had they gone ahead with the release? Wouldn't their calculus be based on the expected returns being less than the (total write off x tax rate) + marketing?
$21 million or < $21 million
DC Shocker: James Gunn, Peter Safran to Lead Film, TV and Animation Division (Exclusive)
The duo will report to David Zaslav and assume the title of co-chairs and co-CEOs of DC Studios.www.hollywoodreporter.com