Complete Scoundrel, Dungeonscape covers (and more)

[Tsillanabor]

I so want Complete Scoundrel!!!

 

[Dog Moon]

I so want Complete Scoundrel!!!

Me too, but not because of the cover. Only cool ones, IMO, are the Dungeonscape and the Demonweb covers.

 

[Mouseferatu]

The Dungeonscape cover has one of the best beholders I've ever seen.

I agree completely, though my internal nitpicker wants to know how a critter that shoots beams from its eyes--and therefore should always hit exactly what it's looking at--could miss with that many shots at once.

Plus he's breaking the "no more than three eye rays in an arc" rule.

 

[Sanackranib]

The Dungeonscape cover has one of the best beholders I've ever seen. It actually looks terrifying, as opposed to a bit silly. And hey! It's co-written by Rich Burlew!

Demiurge out.

f the cover is an indication then roll up new characters for the TPK about to take place! that beholder is smokin' HOT!

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

Plus he's breaking the "no more than three eye rays in an arc" rule.

Didn't you hear? The Beholders went on strike and had that rule revoked.

 

[Dog Moon]

I agree completely, though my internal nitpicker wants to know how a critter that shoots beams from its eyes--and therefore should always hit exactly what it's looking at--could miss with that many shots at once.

Plus he's breaking the "no more than three eye rays in an arc" rule.

Maybe he's using a new feat in the book that we're unaware of.

 

[RichGreen]

Some great covers here, especially Dungeonscape.

Does anyone know what the Cormyr book is? Is it similar to Mysteries of the Moonsea in structure?

Cheers


Richard

 

[Mouseferatu]

Maybe he's using a new feat in the book that we're unaware of.

Oh, sure. Ruin my joke with logic, why don't you?

 

[Nightfall]

Guess what I found...

 

[Sejs]

Maybe he's using a new feat in the book that we're unaware of.

Nah, it's a perspective trick. Three are going in one arc, and that one on the right is going waaaay off to the side at that other dude.


It's all in how you look at it. And given that we're talking about a beholder, that's really saying something.