Cutlass

[Knight Otu]

So on top of my other concerns, Bront, this would be actively inconsistent with some official material? I vote NO.

That would be a concern in LEB, but not really here.

I don't really think it's necessary, as you can always call a different weapon a cutlass, but I see no harm in allowing it, either. Yes.

 

[Patlin]

I considered it important, as a DM who had read stormwrack would be somewhat likely to think he knew what a cutlass was, but would be wrong.

In any event, by standing up and voting no I seem to have created the spur to get DerHauptman the necessary yes votes! By my count, it's now 3 to 1 awaiting the passage of time, right?

 

[Bront]

Yup.

And I understand the concern, but in my case, I have owned the book for months and just found out, so it's obviously not a huge concern to me

 

[Erekose13]

Looks like it's in (or at least its only got 2 hrs). Which is good cause I just realized that I gave one to my players in my game already. A masterwork one at that. (but they've sold it already)

 

[Knight Otu]

Wasn't added yet, so I did.

 

[Bront]

Great. Archive please