MechaPilot
Explorer
But his remarks can at some point down the road be used in an argument before the court calling for legalization of plural can it not?
How so?
The argument for marriage equality for gays is not that marriage has been redefined over time; it is that the ability to marry one other person who is consenting, of legal age, and not too closely related is a fundamental right of society. Marriage may not be a constitutional right, but consider how abhorrent it would be if that right were taken from the people who have traditionally enjoyed it. Would they not feel that a precious right had been stolen from them?