I know a lot of people have been panning the trailer for the new Ghostbusters. However, I recently went back and watched the trailer for the original film, and I was surprised at how bad it is. It can't make up its mind whether it's a horror trailer or a comedy trailer, and it ends up doing both poorly. And it's not as if it can't be done well. The trailer for the Ash vs the Evil Dead series was a great horror comedy trailer.
"They catch the ghosts that won't stay dead." That's an actual line said by a professional voice actor in the trailer. And it's not like it's the voiceover guy's fault. He didn't write that crap. And, he has a good voice for doing horror trailers: given the appropriate horror soundtrack in the background, I could easily see him narrating over the original Exorcist trailer.
Even worse, it's barely funny. There's maybe one moment where I half-chuckled at the trailer. The Little Shop of Horrors trailer, which is from the same time period, is far better.
By just about every possible comparison that I can conceive of, the new Ghostbusters trailer is better than the old one. Whether the new film will be good or not, only time will tell. The trailers for Dredd, and for Live, Die, Repeat made them look like crap, but I've heard they're actually quite good.
That trailer seemed pretty funny to me. It's humor was a lot more subtle than the new one, though...
That trailer seemed pretty funny to me. It's humor was a lot more subtle than the new one, though...
There are some movies that are classic, they come together with story, music, visuals, casting and timing (right place, right time). This is why I do not think, reboots and re-visioning of classic movies work well. This has the appearance of a cast thrown together with jokes.
To be fair though, it's not as if the cast of the original is what was originally intended. John Belushi was supposed to play Murray's part, until he died. And I've heard that Eddie Murphy was originally supposed to play Winston. Would have been a much different movie, filled with SNL alums, if they got what they originally intended to do. Speaking of which, aren't a lot of the female cast in the new film SNL alums?
In the end though, if a reboot or a sequel to any good film is bad, it's not like we really lose anything. I love the original Ghostbusters. If the new film sucks (I hope it won't), that's not going to tarnish my love for the two originals sitting on my DVD shelf. It's not like they're going to pull a Lucas and alter and reissue the originals and claim that the reissue is a purer form of the director's vision for the films.
I'm not sure if that's only true for sci-fi movies, but it's clearly true for several of my all-time favorites: Bladerunner, Alien, 2001. I actually watched several movies and tv shows just because I was interested in the soundtrack or musical score, e.g. There Will Be Blood (Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood), Les revenants (Mogwai).One thing that I think contributes so much to many sci-fi films which end up being classic favourites - Ghostbusters, Star Wars, etc. - is the sound.
I'm not sure if that's only true for sci-fi movies, but it's clearly true for several of my all-time favorites: Bladerunner, Alien, 2001. I actually watched several movies and tv shows just because I was interested in the soundtrack or musical score, e.g. There Will Be Blood (Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood), Les revenants (Mogwai).
It's also the best part I remember about the first 'The Crow' movie - I don't know how often I've listened to that soundtrack. It even led me to discover several bands that are now favorites of mine.
Unfortunately, too many movies and tv shows overdo it in the musical department. I recently watched a movie which had background music or songs in every single second. This was incredibly annyoing after a while and actually distracted me from the movie. Another bad example, at least for me, are the Lord of the Rings movies. I. just. cannot. watch. them. anymore. And just because of the musical score: if I never hear 'Frodo's' Theme' again it will be too early!