MoogleEmpMog
First Post
If the theoretical "3.75" were an improvement on the current rulesset - say, a fantasy version of Star Wars Saga Edition, ideally with more of either a Sword and Sorcery or Final Fantasy vibe, I would buy it and use it rather than upgrading existing d20 core rules to be SWSE compatible.
If 4e is as good or better than a SWSE-based d20 system for my needs, I'll use it. (I'll buy it to write for it whether it is or not, obviously.)
They would not be in any way exclusive of each other.
Neither one nor the other "being D&D" would have any impact on my interest, only one, the other or both "being a good game."
Support wouldn't matter much to me, either. "3.75," if SWSE-based, would be largely compatible with the incredible wealth of d20 Modern and D&D 3.5 supplements already on the market, many of them quite cheap. 4e will invariably have a similar wealth of support from WotC and third party publishers.
If 4e is as good or better than a SWSE-based d20 system for my needs, I'll use it. (I'll buy it to write for it whether it is or not, obviously.)
They would not be in any way exclusive of each other.
Neither one nor the other "being D&D" would have any impact on my interest, only one, the other or both "being a good game."
Support wouldn't matter much to me, either. "3.75," if SWSE-based, would be largely compatible with the incredible wealth of d20 Modern and D&D 3.5 supplements already on the market, many of them quite cheap. 4e will invariably have a similar wealth of support from WotC and third party publishers.