Just RQ, I think.Voadam said:There is going to be an open license for RQ and the Lankhmar material?
Voadam said:There is going to be an open license for RQ and the Lankhmar material?
Let's just hope that it doesn't mean we're having to buy Call of Cthulhu again.SWBaxter said:Chaosium's revision of the BRP ruleset might just get published this year, rebranded as d100. Be interesting to see what the differences between the two are.
Garnfellow said:*Considering that Robin Laws and Ken Hite have both been working on Mongoose's Runequest project, one can have pretty high hopes.
Garnfellow said:Chris Pramas, in his blog, mentions that Green Ronin was offered the rights to Lanhkmar but turned it down. What a depressing statement on the state of d20. I'm really not sure if Runequest will or will not prove an able engine for a Lanhkmar game*, but I'm sure Green Ronin would have made a great d20 version.
*Considering that Robin Laws and Ken Hite have both been working on Mongoose's Runequest project, one can have pretty high hopes.
It would have been somewhat redundant with Thieves' World (I mean, in spirit), and the city of Lankhmar as a setting would also be somewhat redundant with Freeport which is scheduled to see a new incarnation. So all in all, a bad business decision I think, would be to also publish Lankhmar.Garnfellow said:Chris Pramas, in his blog, mentions that Green Ronin was offered the rights to Lanhkmar but turned it down. What a depressing statement on the state of d20. I'm really not sure if Runequest will or will not prove an able engine for a Lanhkmar game*, but I'm sure Green Ronin would have made a great d20 version.
Agreed. True20 over d20, and even over RQ as far as I am concerned, would do better for Lankhmar.JoeGKushner said:Hmmm... wonder why they wouldn't have done it in True 20 as opposed to D&D. It's not like True 20 couldn't use a good sword and sorcery setting.