That production is too far back in time (and not so great), so it's not current canon.
well, Cap is right even without Ross's untrustworthiness, but yeah, also that.The Incredible Hulk (2008, the Ed Norton film) is canon. In The Avengers, we have this exchange:
Tony Stark: You should come by Stark Tower sometime. Top 10 floors all R&D, you'd love it... it's candyland.
Bruce Banner: Thanks, but the last time I was in New York I kind of broke... Harlem.
There are other references to TIH scattered around. For example, in Iron Man 2, when Fury is having his discussion with Stark as to whether he'll be a member of the Avengers Initiative, or just a consultant, there are scenes of the College battle from TIH in the background on the SHIELD monitors.
That there's some continuity there is kind of important, as General Ross plays a notable role in Civil War, and what kind of man he is is established in TIH. The argument is that The Avengers cannot be trusted to operate independently, so they give control to a man who is notably responsible for the creation of the Abomination? That the political machine would turn control to such a man rather justifies Cap's resistance to the Accords, and sets the moral conflict for the movie!
The Incredible Hulk (2008, the Ed Norton film) is canon. In The Avengers, we have this exchange:
Tony Stark: You should come by Stark Tower sometime. Top 10 floors all R&D, you'd love it... it's candyland.
Bruce Banner: Thanks, but the last time I was in New York I kind of broke... Harlem.
There are other references to TIH scattered around. For example, in Iron Man 2, when Fury is having his discussion with Stark as to whether he'll be a member of the Avengers Initiative, or just a consultant, there are scenes of the College battle from TIH in the background on the SHIELD monitors.
That there's some continuity there is kind of important, as General Ross plays a notable role in Civil War, and what kind of man he is is established in TIH. The argument is that The Avengers cannot be trusted to operate independently, so they give control to a man who is notably responsible for the creation of the Abomination? That the political machine would turn control to such a man rather justifies Cap's resistance to the Accords, and sets the moral conflict for the movie!
True enough. I wish you hadn't reminded me, for now it will forever taint my memory of "The Avengers."
I don't see why. We can accept the events happening, without carrying along the not-great storytelling. And at least the mutated poodles aren't part of that bargain
The timelines not clear so I'm going with the idea that Lukes story happens just before or in parallel to 'Civil War' which means 1) the Sokovia Accord isn't in effect 2) SHIELD is still recovering and 3) all of their resources are being dedicated to the Avengers break up.
whats more pertinent is that The Incident still looms large in public consciousness yet nobody in Harlem seems to remember Hulk and Abomination's "Harlem Terror"