For the record, I think players holding out is crappy policy as well. Are you saying that they should both have the ability to ignore contracts?
I'm saying neither should.
No, I think contracts should be honored. I use and honor them every day in my business. But in this case, both sides are guilty of the same thing.
Perhaps I'm getting the wrong impression from Teflon Billy's posts. it seems to me your villafying the owners for actions that the players have been using as status quo.
Once either side breaks the boundries of the contract, it's open game. Both sides have proven the "a contract is made to be broken" adage. Quite frankly, by siding with the owners, I feel that I'm choosing the lesser of two evils.