Wow - that took quite a bit of time!
I took quite a while in selecting for that answer as well, for all of the same reasons. It would have been nice to have a way to qualify answers.I was disappointed that there wasn't a way to say, "I value really deep stories, but I explicitly don't want a pervasive default setting." It felt like any time I answered "I like deep campaign lore", it could (and would) be interpreted as support for the Realms.
*shrugs* Took survey, had some thoughts. Didn't expect a sort of Spanish Inquisition after the fact
Their chief weapon is surprise.It's Ok. Nobody expects it.
*shrugs* Took survey, had some thoughts. Didn't expect a sort of Spanish Inquisition after the fact
Not sure if their analysis will go this deep but a strong-agree to "I like deep campaign lore" wouldn't imply much support for FR if you also answered "Homebrew" to the question of what setting you usually use.
I was disappointed with the survey. While they re-asked the same questions like three or four times, to learn how important I found things, the questions were not asked in the DM section. Therefore, they did not get representative feedback from myself and others that have strong differences between what we find important as a player vs as a DM running the game.