pukunui
Legend
Just wanted to jump in and say that I really like what you've put together here, Gneech. As much as I've been pro-4e more or less since its announcement, and while it is mostly a vast improvement over 3.5, I'm finding that it's still just not quite what I want ...
However, one of the other guys is running a SWSE game, and I'm absolutely loving it. For all the talk of streamlining the D&D rules with 4e and all that, I think that SWSE is, with a few exceptions, far more streamlined and elegant a system than 4e. I vastly prefer the talent-based system to the powers-based system.
So more and more I keep thinking that it would be quite fun to use SWSE as the basis for a fantasy game. There are some things in your conversion that I'm not sure I like or would want to use, but there's a lot there that I really like a lot (and I'm eagerly awaiting version 2.0 as I suspect it may be even more to my liking than your version 1.02 -- any idea when you'll have 2.0 finished?).
I don't know if my group would go for it though. They seem to like 4e. I've asked if anyone would be interested in playing SWSE as a fantasy game, though, so we'll see what they say.
Cheers,
Jonathan
However, one of the other guys is running a SWSE game, and I'm absolutely loving it. For all the talk of streamlining the D&D rules with 4e and all that, I think that SWSE is, with a few exceptions, far more streamlined and elegant a system than 4e. I vastly prefer the talent-based system to the powers-based system.
So more and more I keep thinking that it would be quite fun to use SWSE as the basis for a fantasy game. There are some things in your conversion that I'm not sure I like or would want to use, but there's a lot there that I really like a lot (and I'm eagerly awaiting version 2.0 as I suspect it may be even more to my liking than your version 1.02 -- any idea when you'll have 2.0 finished?).
I don't know if my group would go for it though. They seem to like 4e. I've asked if anyone would be interested in playing SWSE as a fantasy game, though, so we'll see what they say.
Cheers,
Jonathan