You should really have read the thread and links. The amazon bestseller list is based on most of 2008, from January till October, and based on number of customer orders. Hows that not a strong indication of awesome sales?
Or maybe you are one of those that claim that WotC bribed both Amazon.com and the New York Times to be creative with the numbers?
You aren't by chance a rabid 4E fanboy?
I never disputed that 4E sells good, I just said that amazon sales rank doesn't give any indication of how many books are sold.
Being Number 2 on the Amazon sales rank in the week/month a new Harry Potter book was published means something different than being Number 2 when the Number 1 is Business Mathematics extra complex edition.
A place in the anual bestseller list is a better indication if something sells well or not, but it still doesn't enable you to compare it with another product which was not sold at the same time.
Also if you had read all the links you would had realized that not only the anual amazon bestseller list was mentioned. My commend was mainly aimed at the trendrr graphs.
I'd be surprised if anyone at the shareholders' meeting even knew the answer to the question, and even more surprised if they answered the question. WOTC is such a small part of HAS that it barely rates a line in the 10k.
But wouldn't you as shareholder have the right to access this information?
Last edited: