Aus_Snow
First Post
I nearly went to check if it was (somehow!) April 1. 
Ah, lost for words now. Just couldn't help posting this one, is all.

Ah, lost for words now. Just couldn't help posting this one, is all.
No, not from the consumer's standpoint. That is an issue for Amazon, the Lawbreaker and the Rights Holder. There is little difference between this and if Amazon broke into the customer's mailbox or house to take back a package.And also companies trying to sell things they don't actually have the legal right to sell.
You're right. In several court cases I remember reading about, courts have decided that consumers could keep goods that they had a reasonable right to think were purchased legally. Amazon could easily have just pulled the book from its inventory without erasing the books from consumers' Kindles. They could have then taken legal action against the people who illegally uploaded the booksNo, not from the consumer's standpoint. That is an issue for Amazon, the Lawbreaker and the Rights Holder. There is little difference between this and if Amazon broke into the customer's mailbox or house to take back a package.Leaving money behind in no way counteracts the violation.