My apologies!She, not he.
My apologies!She, not he.
My apologies!
If I remember high school biology right, canteloupe are just swollen ovaries full of seeds, making them woman *parts*, so the name seems most definitely female.
Indeed. I misread this when I first got martial power and played a one shot with a dual axe dwarf, only to become disappointed when I re-read the power later (with a warlord I was marking 3 creatures a round). Now I'd be more than happy to take this again.Not only that, but I would argue the class has MORE appeal now (at least for me) that it's not just an "I do damage" look but actually as an at-will way to mark multiple foes.
Indeed. I misread this when I first got martial power and played a one shot with a dual axe dwarf, only to become disappointed when I re-read the power later (with a warlord I was marking 3 creatures a round). Now I'd be more than happy to take this again.
Those 'inviable' ranger powers have a tendancy to do other things besides 'attack for 1[W]' however. And also, if you're not two-weapon fighting (Like, say, you don't want to have to redraw your bow every time you need to melee something, or you're a beast master, or you multiclassed into ranger to get the sweet utility dodging feats) then those powers have a lot more upside.
Moar Damage isn't always the key to building a good striker.
And your point about not dual-wielding as a ranger is a little silly: what you're saying is "if you can't or won't use the powers in question, their power is irrelevant". No stunning revelation there.
I believe that even with this, multi-attack powers on one target have competitive damage output. And attacking multiple targets is very tempting, because you get to apply those damage bonuses more than once.