It's a lot harder to see what WotC could actually sue over though.
That's true, although I'm not sure what would actually provoke them to go that far anyway, aside from perhaps systematic piracy and distribution of proprietary materials on or about their release dates, up to and including PH2.
I suppose if somebody was ballsy/stupid enough to consistently disregard their C&D, we'd find out. I don't predict any lawsuits against iPlay4E in the near future, at any rate.
While it is possible that they will get a C&D letter, given that iPlay4e is using the compendium API in a manner that requires a constant subscription to DDI, and doesn't enable a person to, with two clicks of their mouse, download the Compendium to their HD and no longer require a subscription, the way that MP does, I find it unlikely that they will get a C&D letter. On the order of orders of magnitude less.
Absolutely. I only meant what I said in a general way, rather than to imply that I think any major change to WotC's policies are soon forthcoming.
Still, for those few who are still missing the larger context here, it needs to be reiterated that,
first, we don't, can't, and likely won't ever know exactly what WotC is thinking or doing; and
second, WotC still has the right to change its attitude and policies surrounding D&DI uses at any time.*
It's really,
really unlikely that WotC will suddenly take action against iPlay4E come Monday morning, but technically speaking, it is remotely possible.
*There's probably an even more remote chance that a sudden change of policy on WotC's part could prompt legal retaliation against WotC, and a yet more remote chance that it would ever succeed. I'm being very hypothetical, of course.