• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

How much back story for a low-level PC?

How much back story for a low-level PC?

  • As a DM - multiple pages

    Votes: 6 4.3%
  • As a DM - one page

    Votes: 26 18.8%
  • As a DM - couple-few paragraphs

    Votes: 58 42.0%
  • As a DM - one paragraph

    Votes: 42 30.4%
  • As a DM - one sentence

    Votes: 16 11.6%
  • As a DM – none

    Votes: 8 5.8%
  • -----

    Votes: 12 8.7%
  • As a Player - multiple pages

    Votes: 10 7.2%
  • As a Player - one page

    Votes: 30 21.7%
  • As a Player - couple-few paragraphs

    Votes: 53 38.4%
  • As a Player - one paragraph

    Votes: 45 32.6%
  • As a Player - one sentence

    Votes: 15 10.9%
  • As a Player - none

    Votes: 7 5.1%

Sorry, RC. You're the one with strawman here. I also never said that any NPC could do it. We're talking about a specific NPC.

Obviously. But, unless that specific NPC is special, then we are really talking about any NPC. And if that specific NPC is special, there should be indications that this is so.

Indications that a person is special, obviously, need not be walking "around telegraphing their intentions to become liches all their life".

That's another easily contradicted falsehood.

Only if you accept the fallacy of the excluded middle.

:lol:



RC
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Obviously. But, unless that specific NPC is special, then we are really talking about any NPC. And if that specific NPC is special, there should be indications that this is so.
Of course there are indications that they are special. 1) named. 2) called out in a PC's background.

It's not just "anyone."
RC said:
Only if you accept the fallacy of the excluded middle.

:lol:
Nope. It's just plain and simple false. EDIT: Excluded middle isn't relevant to the example here. Did you check which assertion you were responding to?

You could possibly make that assertion about my claim that if the mom can't become a lich, then lich's can't exist. But I don't think so, because Neonchameleon hasn't offered up any alternative method to becoming a lich other than the manner in which the rules indicate, and clearly it's possible according for the rules for the mom to become a lich. If he says it's impossible then it's impossible for anyone, no excluded middle. Of course, that claim is simply false, so its a moot point anyway.

Not to mention his cherry-picking of editions to attempt to bolster his claim. Which also doesn't really work, because just because the numbers are a little higher in 2e than in 3e doesn't make them any less out of reach. It can still be done.
 
Last edited:

Yes, and it's just wrong. Why do you keep saying something that's so obviously wrong? I've given you the example of PCs and you keep saying that you think that PC's are "different" somehow; that just because PCs can do it, doesn't mean NPCs can. In fact, you seem to be insisting that they can't.

Once again you are not reading. My point is that PCs level orders of magnitudes faster than NPCs. I've even explained why (that PCs are pushing themselves right to the limit on a near continual basis) and what you would expect to see if an NPC was levelling like a PC. Much ass being kicked and many names being taken. The fates of countries or realms changed. Rivers of blood and mountains of skulls (even if not expressed that way).

If your NPCs are not doing this then they are not levelling like PCs. And if Experience Points are gained independently of experiences and NPCs level at the same rate as PCs without the same risks then you change the world in a way I've already explained (hordes of really high level NPCs and there being nothing much for low level PCs to do (unleash the slightly bored housewives!))

That is a patently and obviously nonsensical thing to say. It's just flat out wrong in inanely obvious fashion. It's the equivalent of saying that grass on earth tends to be purple and the sky tends to drip blood.

No. It's simply that you keep claiming that PCs can do something and ignoring how they do it. And the consequences.

IF THE PCs CAN DO IT, THEN SO CAN AN NPC. Otherwise, NPCs wouldn't be able to have PC classes at all.

But this is a case of the NPCs not doing what the PCs do. Your whole argument misses this point.

If liches can exist in the campaign setting at all, THEN AN NPC CAN BECOME ONE. You keep insisting that this is impossible. Your insistence, then precludes the very existance of liches.

And once again, you miss my point. It's not to deny that there are high level NPC mages capable of turning themselves into Liches. There clearly are. It's not to deny there are incredibly intelligent NPCs. There clearly are. It's that this doesn't happen overnight - and seldom in ten years. In the case of superhuman intelligence, you want to reroll her stats? In the case of levelling, to level even that fast you need to behave like a PC. And this involves changing the setting like a PC. And, while we're on the subject, gaining a reputation like a PC.

Some NPCs can become Liches. Just as some PCs can. If you're a Fighter, you're SOL. This doesn't mean all have that potential. Or that any can do it in a short timescale.

Again... none of those are changed, because none of them were defined.

Ah, now I understand what lead to the weirdness in The Forest Oracle. It isn't defined that people aren't jumping around on pogo sticks unless it explicitely says they aren't.

A few sentences of backstory does not define attributes, class or much of anything else.

No. But it does pull out notable features. If a feature is extremely notable and wasn't mentioned, then adding it is a change.

Your continued insistence that this is a change when it, in fact, is nothing of the sort, is another example of your stubborn wrongheadedness.

Fine. It isn't a change to say that she has two heads and eight arms?

Please... if we're going to have an intelligent discussion about this issue, QUIT MAKING STUFF UP ABOUT IT and then insisting that what YOU MADE UP must be true. It simply isn't the case that just because you say something over and over again it's true.

Then try addressing rather than ignoring my points.

There you go making stuff up again. Every other ambitious mage in the land? So; again, liches can't actually exist in D&D then? Characters can't actually advance, then?

Will you quit with your damn strawmen? Especially when I've already dealt with them?

NPCs can advance like PCs if they behave like PCs. This leaves a visible trail of destruction and makes them famous. And gives them a very short life expectancy.

NPCs can also advance like NPCs. This is a lot safer (which is why most do it that way. It also takes a lot longer. Wizards take more than a year per level most of the time (normally a lot more). Which is why most of the high level mages are very old. The other way is to behave like a PC. Anything else blows the setting assumptions out of the water and leaves the land littered with incredibly high levelled NPCs.

Seriously, think through these ridiculous claims before you make them. Shooting holes in your arguments are like shooting fish in a barrel.

No. It's like tilting at straw men and then declaring victory.

OF COURSE I THINK THAT! There are rules, right there for anyone to read in just the first few pages of the PHB that describe exactly how that happens. That's happened in every single campaign of D&D that I've ever heard of that ran that long. If PCs can do it, then OF COURSE ITS POSSIBLE TO DO and your continued insistence that its impossible is.... just... gah! So ridiculous!

She didn't behave like a PC. She didn't do a single thing a PC did to gain experience points.

That's not true either. There's no correllation whatsoever between level and fame. Most D&D PCs are doing their thing in dungeons, not population centers. Plus, if you were trying to become a lich, don't you think just a little bit of discretion might be a good idea?

And if you are doing it the slow way, then all your arguments about the way PCs gain levels are demonstrably useless

Again, with the totally unjustified and made up restrictions. Seriously, cut that out.

So. She doesn't fight. She doesn't adventure. She doesn't explore. She doesn't do one damn thing a PC does to gain experience points. And yet she gains them at the same rate. And you say I'm making up unjustified restrictions?
 

I find it kind of humorous hat you pointed to 3E to support one claim then jump to 2E to support your standpoint here. 3E requirements are much less strict: Charisma 15 (13 starting plus two level increases) and 11 levels of sorcerer or Intelligence 16 (14 starting) and 11 levels of wizard.

OK. My 3e core books are on long term loan - but it's one of the two editions I think in. On the other hand I have a 2e MM on my bookshelf. Even so, L11 still blows the curves apart - although isn't as ridiculous.
 

Speaking of Gardner Fox, Dr. Fate's original background (archaeologist's son that found an Egyptian wizard's tomb) was pretty skimpy, but got pretty impressive later (agent of Nabu, one of the Lords of Order).
Dr Fate's a total lichmom!

See, people are using it already. It's a great term.
 

Once again you are not reading.
Bah. Again, so wrong.
Neonchameleon said:
So. She doesn't fight. She doesn't adventure. She doesn't explore. She doesn't do one damn thing a PC does to gain experience points. And yet she gains them at the same rate. And you say I'm making up unjustified restrictions?
Are you freakin' kidding me? This is what this has hinged on? You haven't somehow figured out that just because she wasn't doing that ten years ago doesn't mean a freakin' thing about what she's done in the ten years since?

Really? That was your objection? You're insisting that the mom can't have anything in the ten years since the PC last saw her? That she's been sitting there in stasis just waiting for the PC to come back in town and interact with her again? Would you please explain how in the world you arrived at such a ridiculous, bone-headed assumption?

Y'know what? Nevermind. This argument is so freaking stupid. I'm done.
 

Once again you are not reading. My point is that PCs level orders of magnitudes faster than NPCs.

If your NPCs are not doing this then they are not levelling like PCs.

And once again, you miss my point. It's not to deny that there are high level NPC mages capable of turning themselves into Liches. There clearly are. It's not to deny there are incredibly intelligent NPCs. There clearly are. It's that this doesn't happen overnight - and seldom in ten years.

NPCs can advance like PCs if they behave like PCs. This leaves a visible trail of destruction and makes them famous. And gives them a very short life expectancy.

NPCs can also advance like NPCs. This is a lot safer (which is why most do it that way. It also takes a lot longer. Wizards take more than a year per level most of the time (normally a lot more). Which is why most of the high level mages are very old. The other way is to behave like a PC. Anything else blows the setting assumptions out of the water and leaves the land littered with incredibly high levelled NPCs.

A PC often gains 20 levels in less than one year's game time (reference source: just about every Paizo adventure path). Ten years is not long enough for an NPC to gain somewhere between 11-18 levels depending on your game system of choice?


She didn't behave like a PC. She didn't do a single thing a PC did to gain experience points.

So. She doesn't fight. She doesn't adventure. She doesn't explore. She doesn't do one damn thing a PC does to gain experience points. And yet she gains them at the same rate. And you say I'm making up unjustified restrictions?

No, she gets them slower. It takes her 10 to 20 times longer to level than a PC. And, as a player, how do you know how she's earning that XP? What's to say she's not out adventuring in her own right? You've declared it so, not provided any real evidence that she couldn't behave like a PC.
 

[/I]


Is there a massive swathe of corpses in her wake? Has she utterly reordered her surroundings? Did she join a party to compensate for her weaknesses (being incredibly squishy - remember housecats can beat up L1 wizards)? Or is the town more or less as it was before? In which case she didn't do things the PC way.

Actually, yes there was a swath of bodies in her wake - she was threatening a very powerful nation with her hordes of undead and magical abilities.

And, she had been an adventurer with the PC's father, but stopped to give birth to the two daughters.
 
Last edited:

Bah. Again, so wrong.

Are you freakin' kidding me? This is what this has hinged on? You haven't somehow figured out that just because she wasn't doing that ten years ago doesn't mean a freakin' thing about what she's done in the ten years since?

Really? That was your objection? You're insisting that the mom can't have anything in the ten years since the PC last saw her? That she's been sitting there in stasis just waiting for the PC to come back in town and interact with her again? Would you please explain how in the world you arrived at such a ridiculous, bone-headed assumption?

Y'know what? Nevermind. This argument is so freaking stupid. I'm done.

And as normal, you read, discard the bits you can't answer (i.e. most of it), and declare victory.

If she had adventured. If she had changed the setting. There would be a huge trail. She'd be either famous or infamous. Being a PC creates waves. And large ones.

A PC often gains 20 levels in less than one year's game time (reference source: just about every Paizo adventure path). Ten years is not long enough for an NPC to gain somewhere between 11-18 levels depending on your game system of choice?

Again, not if you want to keep the power levels to something approaching the default setting.

No, she gets them slower. It takes her 10 to 20 times longer to level than a PC. And, as a player, how do you know how she's earning that XP? What's to say she's not out adventuring in her own right? You've declared it so, not provided any real evidence that she couldn't behave like a PC.

PCs create waves. They change the entire environment around them. They step over mountains of skulls on their way to the top (and often the skulls of big creatures). It's known where PCs passed.
 

PCs create waves. They change the entire environment around them. They step over mountains of skulls on their way to the top (and often the skulls of big creatures). It's known where PCs passed.

Not always. Going by plenty of stories you here around EN World PCs wake is more a comedy of errors then a mountains of killed foes. It all depends on the style of game and the base game doe not assume anything on it.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top