Nifft
Penguin Herder
Since we don't really understand the process by which the Earth maintains its magnetic field, it's well within the realm of possibility that a larger, more massive planet would be able to maintain one.Yes, a 37 day rotation should be fast enough to get a liquid core spinning a bit. I don't know if being tidally locked will tide lock the core as well, though. I suspect not; Mercury is tidally locked for a large portion of its orbit, and it still has a magnetic field (1% the strength of Earth's). Mercury is smaller and it rotates slower than 581g (Mercury rotates 3 times for every 2 orbits around the sun; it's tide locked when it is close and rotates halfway when it's far); it rotates once every 59 days, or 60% the speed of 581.
Since 581g is larger, it could have more iron in its core. The larger size combined with the faster rotation means the core is spinning faster (37 days for a planet larger than earth is much faster than 59 days for mercury). I would suspect that 581g, if its core is still molten (and it is larger so it should hold onto heat longer), should have some magnetic field.
The problems are photons and ions, and the magnetic field generally takes care of the ions.I also suspect a thicker atmosphere, combined with the lower UV output of the star, and the higher gravity, should help 581g hang onto more of its atmosphere (If I'm correct, the biggest problem is photons from the sun energizing air molecules so much that they escape the planet's gravity).
If the moon is significant, it may be the result of an event which imparted spin to the planet. For a phase-locked world, tiny moons seem more plausible.I was looking into some more indepth astronomy, and I hear there is a way to determine the optimal orbital distance for moons around a planet. Something about the gravity well it creates. Too close to the parent star, the planet's gravity well may be too shallow to hold a large moon. I'm just curious, as I'd like a moon or moons for appearance but I don't want them if I'm going to have to support them with magic.
- - -
IMHO a pair of mutually phase-locked planets would be a VERY interesting setting. There would be a cool "twilight zone" on their inward-facing sides, with relatively normal days & seasons as you went to the away-facing sides. If they were close enough to allow Teleportation to move between the worlds, they'd be able to accommodate high-level travelers but not much in the way of normal trade.
Cheers, -- N