Mercurius
Legend
Well, you did say you missed 4e. There are plenty of non-essentials 4e stuff out there, I assume you have some of it. So why not use it? Whats to "miss"?
Unless by "miss" what you really mean is "I'm disappointed no new classes/feats/powers will be printed between hard-back bindings in the upcoming months". But that's a lot to get out of the word "miss"...
Miss usually implies something was taken away from you. Did WotC take away your 4e books and replace them with Essentials? If so, I definately see your point! I'd be upset too!
Well it seems that you missed the first sentence of my post about being hyperbolic. But to answer your question, obviously not. And this is the same argument that many (including myself) have thrown at disgruntled 3.5 fans when 4E came out. That's not what I'm saying. Nor do I care all that much about new crunch; what I take issue with is the general lack of new material, whether crunch or fluff. And, to answer Nebten's question (which I answered in the OP, I believe) I do not buy all of the hardcovers, maybe about 60% of them. I don't buy any of the Power books, I haven't bought the Dragon and Dungeon Annuals, the Player's Strategy Guide, the Player's Guides, and maybe one or two others. I buy the core books and their extensions, the theme/fluff books (e.g. The Plane Above, Underdark, etc), and the campaign settings.
In that context, to rephrase my original post, what I am taking issue with is:
- The lack of new material along those lines for the period from mid-August to mid-March or mid-April, in favor of a re-packaged, re-formatted, re-releasing of what is, ah, essentially old material.
- The possibility that the "Era of the hardcover" is over, and that the direction for 4E going forward is Essentials.
The thing about the Essentials books is that, even if you avoid "playing Essentials" as it were, each of those books has elements that can be cannibalized into a more "traditional 4e", as if that were phrase that has any meaning in the first.
Also I have trouble understanding how a book filled with monsters can be an Essentials-exclusive product with no value in a non-Essentials campaign. Yeah, I get that it's part of that product line, but so what? Are they planning huge changes to the way monsters work in Essentials that I haven't heard about?
I didn't say either of those things. What I am saying is that the Essentials products are mainly but not only regurgitations of older products in new formats, formats that I personally like less than the older format (at least insofar as digests vs. hardcovers are concerned). I actually like the non-power oriented martial characters, for instance. But see my response to RigaMortus for more explanation.