Hmmm...
First of all, I'm far from being a WotC apologist. I was among the first to analogize 4Ed to New Coke, after all, and maintain that, while a fine game in it's on right, it is "not D&D to me." But while I have seen WotC do moves I think are foolish in the past few years, I cannot say I've seen them act "boorish."
As for the OGL vs GSL protections & running games online, I cannot give a fully informed analysis, since I never bothered with the GSL. Still, I don't think method of communication between persons playing the game would be grounds for a lawsuit- playing via telepresence machinery of any kind would probably be viewed by the courts to be within the scope of the intended use of the product.
I'm not a worrier. Even though I know that anyone in this country can file a lawsuit, I also know that the profit margins in the RPG biz are slender enough that the likelihood of doing so with bad facts could ruin a company. I simply don't see WotC going after a site that polices itself as well as ENWorld does: lawsuits against similarly well moderated sites tend to lose when brought to trial...if they make it that far.
Responding to a C&D letter is cheap, so no concerns there. Acting in response to it's requests may be expensive...or may just take the form of seeing a few mor mods run the ship a bit tighter, depending upon what was needed.
As for WotC shutting down ENWorld- yeah, that would tick me off. But again, given what i have seen here, I think the probability is slim enough that I'm not going to lose any sleep worrying about it.
It's like you're asking me if I'm worried my fat, flat-toothed 13 year old Border Collie was going to go Cujo on me because I've seen the way she wolfs down her dinner: it's possible, but not very probable, so I'm not wasting my time and energy with an emotional response.
First of all, I'm far from being a WotC apologist. I was among the first to analogize 4Ed to New Coke, after all, and maintain that, while a fine game in it's on right, it is "not D&D to me." But while I have seen WotC do moves I think are foolish in the past few years, I cannot say I've seen them act "boorish."
As for the OGL vs GSL protections & running games online, I cannot give a fully informed analysis, since I never bothered with the GSL. Still, I don't think method of communication between persons playing the game would be grounds for a lawsuit- playing via telepresence machinery of any kind would probably be viewed by the courts to be within the scope of the intended use of the product.
I'm not a worrier. Even though I know that anyone in this country can file a lawsuit, I also know that the profit margins in the RPG biz are slender enough that the likelihood of doing so with bad facts could ruin a company. I simply don't see WotC going after a site that polices itself as well as ENWorld does: lawsuits against similarly well moderated sites tend to lose when brought to trial...if they make it that far.
Because "How would you feel about that?" isn't "What do you think the odds are?" but "How would you feel about Morrus having to respond to C&D letters, and possibly shut down the site?" I.e., how would you feel about that personally?
Responding to a C&D letter is cheap, so no concerns there. Acting in response to it's requests may be expensive...or may just take the form of seeing a few mor mods run the ship a bit tighter, depending upon what was needed.
As for WotC shutting down ENWorld- yeah, that would tick me off. But again, given what i have seen here, I think the probability is slim enough that I'm not going to lose any sleep worrying about it.
It's like you're asking me if I'm worried my fat, flat-toothed 13 year old Border Collie was going to go Cujo on me because I've seen the way she wolfs down her dinner: it's possible, but not very probable, so I'm not wasting my time and energy with an emotional response.