As mentioned, McDonalds knew their coffee was being served too hot.
Obviously, the lawyers on these boards can tell me how true this is, but I recall the following from a class that I took just after the McDonald's incident. Unlike many nations which regulate heavily upfront, he U.S. tends to be more reactionary and rely on litigation to punish manufacturers and businesses. Less regulation up front keeps costs down for both the government (less inspections) and the manufacturer while the threat of, potentialy, high litigation damages are supposed to encourage manufacturers etc. to protect the consumer. It is when the system beaks down and public or worker safety is seen to be threatend or potentially threatened that more upfront regulations are placed.
Obviously, the lawyers on these boards can tell me how true this is, but I recall the following from a class that I took just after the McDonald's incident. Unlike many nations which regulate heavily upfront, he U.S. tends to be more reactionary and rely on litigation to punish manufacturers and businesses. Less regulation up front keeps costs down for both the government (less inspections) and the manufacturer while the threat of, potentialy, high litigation damages are supposed to encourage manufacturers etc. to protect the consumer. It is when the system beaks down and public or worker safety is seen to be threatend or potentially threatened that more upfront regulations are placed.